2016
DOI: 10.21595/jme.2016.18113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain modal analysis and fatigue residual life prediction of vibrating screen beam

Abstract: Abstract. The displacement and strain modal analysis of vibrating screen beam is carried out, the results show that the relative deviation of the modal frequencies between intact and damaged beam is small, the displacement mode shapes of the damaged beam have no obvious variation, but the strain mode shapes have mutation peaks at the damaged location for the damaged beam. Therefore, a damage index is defined as the rate of strain modal change between damaged and intact beam. The rate of strain modal change inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such deformations are both quantifiable on the condition that the transverse stiffness and longitudinal stiffness are available. As the MCCS compression deformation is within 3-7 mm, namely, far less than free length of MCCS and in its linearly-deformed range, the transverse stiffness and longitudinal stiffness are supposed to be a certain constant value [3,5,8,9]. Since the dynamic equation governing DELVS system in Fig.…”
Section: Transverse Stiffness Of a Mccsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such deformations are both quantifiable on the condition that the transverse stiffness and longitudinal stiffness are available. As the MCCS compression deformation is within 3-7 mm, namely, far less than free length of MCCS and in its linearly-deformed range, the transverse stiffness and longitudinal stiffness are supposed to be a certain constant value [3,5,8,9]. Since the dynamic equation governing DELVS system in Fig.…”
Section: Transverse Stiffness Of a Mccsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a), the most common unilateral-driven large vibrating screen has a large vibration mass and demands huge exciting force yielded by two box-type exciters. Due to the effect of coupled load consisting of the intense excitation load initiated by exciters, the inertial load of screen structure and the impact load of the screening materials, the dynamic characteristics of such large vibrating screen are extremely complex, and structural damage such as beam fracture or lateral plate crack occurs frequently [3][4]. Therefore, the low reliability and short service life of the equipment can hardly meet the demand for large-scale screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, long-term alternating loads are highly likely to lead to spring failure through spring stiffness decrease [8], causing a negative influence on the mining vibrating screen. On one hand, spring cracks [9][10][11]. On the other hand, spring failures could produce a loss of particle separation efficiency, thus hardly meeting practical process demands [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical simulations were carried out, and the results showed that the proposed model is feasible. In addition, spring failure simulations were also carried out, and the results indicated that the x, y, and z direction amplitude change rules for all cracks [9][10][11]. On the other hand, spring failures could produce a loss of particle separation efficiency, thus hardly meeting practical process demands [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other research work depends on models generated from experimental data, such as model identification which is also a viable approach if the experimental data is reliable and it is free of stochastic noise components [1,2,4,19]. Other methods rely on finite element method to generate a working model of the structure which can lead to deficiencies in the model's ability to predict the behavior of the physical system, especially if the boundary conditions and the element type chosen for the FE model are not properly specified [10,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%