2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(03)00596-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain path dependence of the precipitate size evolution of an Al–Mg–Li alloy under combined thermal and mechanical loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.002 depending on the solder shape (Dutta et al, 2005;Gong et al, 2006). Likewise in Al and Ni containing alloys, used in aerospace applications, high homologous temperatures give rise to second particle growth and even phase transformation, thereby the microstructure depends strongly on the loading conditions applied (Murken et al, 2003). Precipitate coarsening in particular reduces strength when dislocation bowing is the rate-controlling creep mechanism (Manonukul et al, 2002), but also transformation-mismatch plasticity related to second phase transformation could contribute to creep (Zwigl and Dunand, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.002 depending on the solder shape (Dutta et al, 2005;Gong et al, 2006). Likewise in Al and Ni containing alloys, used in aerospace applications, high homologous temperatures give rise to second particle growth and even phase transformation, thereby the microstructure depends strongly on the loading conditions applied (Murken et al, 2003). Precipitate coarsening in particular reduces strength when dislocation bowing is the rate-controlling creep mechanism (Manonukul et al, 2002), but also transformation-mismatch plasticity related to second phase transformation could contribute to creep (Zwigl and Dunand, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third type of precipitate consists of small black cuboids, which are randomly distributed in the a-Al. Comparing the TEM image of the Li alloy with literature data about Li-containing alloys [24,25], the third precipitate can be identified as the d' Al 3 Li phase (which coexists with two types of Mg 2 Si compounds). A confirmation of the particle composition by EDX measurements is not possible because the light element Li cannot be detected by energy dispersive analysis.…”
Section: Microstructure and Phases Composition Changes During Artificmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…On the other hand, by adding Li to the alloy, nucleation of the T 1 phase constitutes the highest nanometric scale alloy-strengthening feature. This phase has a hexagonal (hcp) structure with lattice parameters a = 4.97, and c = 9.35 Å, and plate-like morphology with large aspect ratio of which the longer edge (needle) lying on [111] Al planes and orientation relationship (0001)-T 1 || (100) Al . In particular, this phase shows its maximum strengthening effect when the needle-shaped edge of the precipitates lye as to have (0001) T1 habit planes || (111) Al , and a [10,11] T1 || Al 110 matrix plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phase has a hexagonal (hcp) structure with lattice parameters a = 4.97, and c = 9.35 Å, and plate-like morphology with large aspect ratio of which the longer edge (needle) lying on [111] Al planes and orientation relationship (0001)-T 1 || (100) Al . In particular, this phase shows its maximum strengthening effect when the needle-shaped edge of the precipitates lye as to have (0001) T1 habit planes || (111) Al , and a [10,11] T1 || Al 110 matrix plane. The T 1 phase has a space group P6/mmm [29] and it has been shown to be shearable by dislocations introduced during plastic deformation techniques [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%