2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-rate effects on elastic and early cell-collapse responses of a polystyrene foam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This sensitivity to strain-rate appears more pronounced at high strain rates in the region of 1,000 s-1, a region representative of impact conditions [16,17]. The high strainrate dependence of polymeric foams has been attributed to both the matrix material properties and the presence of air inside the foam [13].…”
Section: Viscoelastic Characteristic Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This sensitivity to strain-rate appears more pronounced at high strain rates in the region of 1,000 s-1, a region representative of impact conditions [16,17]. The high strainrate dependence of polymeric foams has been attributed to both the matrix material properties and the presence of air inside the foam [13].…”
Section: Viscoelastic Characteristic Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, there are many studies focused on constitutive relationships of polymer foams [3][4][5]. Compressive properties at dynamic strain rates are very important for shock absorbers; therefore, many researchers have studied energy absorption performance of polymer foams at dynamic strain rates by using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) equipment [6,7]. In general, these foams are suitable enough to absorb impact energy at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…finding stress-strain responses at strain rates higher than quasi-static is essential for predicting its behavior in many real-world applications such as energy-absorption under impact loads. However, generating stress-strain data at dynamic strain rates is often a challenging task due to the necessity of specialized equipment such as a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar [1,2,3] which can be expensive and not ordinarily available in an engineering laboratory. This device, despite perhaps being the best resource for ascertaining material behavior at high strain rates, has limitations due to its indirect nature arising from reliance on one-dimensional wave theory for solids, difficulty in performing tensile tests, special material requirements for incident and transmission bars for testing of soft materials such as foam and fibre-reinforced composites, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%