2021
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain rate effects on thermoplastic composites with mechanical interlocking

Abstract: Fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites are limited due to poor interfacial bonding between the nonpolar/nonreactive polymer matrix and fiber surface.Recently, a concept of controlled mechanical interlocking between fiber and matrix surface was proposed to improve the interfacial bonding in fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. Study results show promising performance of the approach under static loading conditions. In this work, we study the effect of strain rate on the interfacial bonding behavior und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 2 ] Properties of CFRTP are decided by CF, thermoplastic matrix, as well as the interphase formed between the two phases. The interface transfers the load from matrix to fibers, [ 3 ] which is the crucial region determining the set of composite properties, such as mechanical performance, reliability, and so forth. [ 4–6 ] The interface theories of CFRTP mainly include physical bonding, such as wetting behavior, [ 7 ] mechanical interlocking, [ 8,9 ] interfacial crystallization [ 10 ] and chemical bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 ] Properties of CFRTP are decided by CF, thermoplastic matrix, as well as the interphase formed between the two phases. The interface transfers the load from matrix to fibers, [ 3 ] which is the crucial region determining the set of composite properties, such as mechanical performance, reliability, and so forth. [ 4–6 ] The interface theories of CFRTP mainly include physical bonding, such as wetting behavior, [ 7 ] mechanical interlocking, [ 8,9 ] interfacial crystallization [ 10 ] and chemical bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences are usually observed in terms of internal damages when composite laminates are subjected to quasi‐static indentation or dynamic loadings. [ 28,29 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] A few references have compared the low velocity impact behaviors of thermoplastic laminates at room temperature (RT) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] as well as at low, [11][12][13][14][15][16] high temperatures, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] including strain rate effects. [27][28][29][30] The influence of hybridization on the impact behavior was investigated as well. [31,32] TP laminates usually demonstrate lower structural loss up to 200%, lower contact force by 14%, and lower absorbed energy by 48% compared with those of TS counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, researchers have gained interest in the three‐Network model (TNM) [ 31 ] for accurately predicting the nonlinear, viscoelastic, or viscoplastic behavior of different polymers at small and large strains. TNM has been studied for various applications, including the effect of thermoplastic composites, [ 32 ] to explore the time and temperature‐dependent behavior of high‐density polyethylene, [ 33 ] to design novel polymer‐on‐metal hip joint prosthesis, [ 34 ] and to investigate the strain rate and temperature effect on epoxy polymer. [ 35 ] Although we have a wide range of models available in the literature to predict the mechanics of traditional hyperelastic materials, the behavior of hollow melt–extruded fibers has yet to be dissected extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%