1968
DOI: 10.1101/sqb.1968.033.01.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strand Selection During Bacterial Mating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has no free end and is therefore protected from exonuclease attack and TraI is suitably oriented to catalyse a second transesterification that results in the termination of strand transfer. This would also be consistent with an overall 5Ј to 3Ј polarity of transfer of genetic markers from an Hfr strain (Ohki and Tomizawa, 1968;Rupp and Ihler, 1968), as DNA sequences located at the 5Ј end of the transferred strand would enter the recipient cell first. Confirmation of this view awaits complete reconstitution of nicking/unwinding in vitro, which has not yet been achieved for any system.…”
Section: Relaxosome Assemblysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It has no free end and is therefore protected from exonuclease attack and TraI is suitably oriented to catalyse a second transesterification that results in the termination of strand transfer. This would also be consistent with an overall 5Ј to 3Ј polarity of transfer of genetic markers from an Hfr strain (Ohki and Tomizawa, 1968;Rupp and Ihler, 1968), as DNA sequences located at the 5Ј end of the transferred strand would enter the recipient cell first. Confirmation of this view awaits complete reconstitution of nicking/unwinding in vitro, which has not yet been achieved for any system.…”
Section: Relaxosome Assemblysupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It has long been known that the nicked DNA strand enters the recipient cell with a 5'-to-3' polarity during the process of bacterial conjugation (16,20). Presumably, the end is blocked in some way to protect the transferred DNA from attack by exonucleases within the recipient cell.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 TraI with the DNA helicase activity in the direction from 5 0 to 3 0 unwinds double-stranded DNA from the nick introduced. The single-stranded DNA so generated is thought to be transferred to the recipient cell in the direction from 5 0 to 3 0 (Ohki & Tomizawa 1968;Cohen et al 1968;Rupp & Ihler 1968). Note that the 5 0 end of the single-stranded DNA to be transferred is attached with TraI, and that any proteins including TraI are not transferred by conjugation (Silver et al 1965;Rees & Wilkins 1990).…”
Section: The Rejoining Reaction Involved In Termination Of Conjugal Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The site-and strand-specific nicking is thought to be the initiation reaction of DNA transfer promoted by a conjugative plasmid; nicking facilitates the production of the single-stranded DNA, which is transferred to the recipient cell in the 5 0 to 3 0 direction (Ohki & Tomizawa 1968;Cohen et al 1968;Rupp & Ihler 1968) by the action of TraI with the DNA helicase activity unwinding the double-stranded DNA in the direction from 5 0 to 3 0 (Lahue & Matson 1988;Fukuda & Ohtsubo 1995). It has been reported that conjugative plasmids, which belong to different incompatibility groups from the group IncF of F and F-like plasmids, encode endonucleases which have other activities both in cleaving the singlestranded DNA at a specific site and in rejoining the cleaved products (Bhattacharjee & Meyer 1991;Scherzinger et al 1992;Pansegrau et al 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%