2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2011.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic accessibility competition

Abstract: We analyze the effect of competition in market-accessibility enhancement among quality-differentiated firms. Firms are located in regions with different ex-ante transport costs to reach the final market. We characterize the equilibrium of the two-stage game in which firms first invest to improve market accessibility and then compete in prices. Efforts in accessibility improvement crucially depend on the interplay between the willingness to pay for the quality premium of the median consumer and the ex-ante diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Companies that do so must believe the cost of postponing the investment is greater than the value abandoned from initial exercise (Bacchiega et al 2012;Briglauer et al 2013;Koetter and Noth 2013). In summary, under the NPV, companies do not see the value of waiting, while under the options theory; the value of waiting is engaged but overestimated because of the lack of competition.…”
Section: Insightsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Companies that do so must believe the cost of postponing the investment is greater than the value abandoned from initial exercise (Bacchiega et al 2012;Briglauer et al 2013;Koetter and Noth 2013). In summary, under the NPV, companies do not see the value of waiting, while under the options theory; the value of waiting is engaged but overestimated because of the lack of competition.…”
Section: Insightsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We investigate a two-stage game in which the manufacturer first chooses its strategy, before the retailers compete with each other. 3 Our model is closely related to that in Chiang, Chhajed and Hess (2003). They use the vertical differentiation approach to develop a model that incorporates products of different qualityà la Mussa and Rosen (1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show that a monopoly manufacturer can increase their profit by intentionally damaging a high-quality product to produce a low-quality counterpart even if the marginal cost of the latter is higher than that of the former. 3 The horizontal differentiation approachà la Hotelling (1929) has also been used in the literature of industrial organization and marketing science. See Matsushima (2004), Coughlan and Soberman (2005), and Ishibashi and Matsushima (2009) for example.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%