Strategic alignment matrix

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to proposes a framework, labeled strategic alignment matrix, to attain organizational alignment by integrating the horizontal dimension of performance (results driven by activities carried out by multiple organizational units) and the vertical one (results of single units) through the use of a sophisticated information structure composed by quantitative measures and management processes. Design/methodology/approach A science-based design approach was adopted. A review of the literature on strategic performance measurement systems (SPMS) and coordination allowed the identification of a set of design principles (guidelines reflecting the accumulated knowledge in the literature). The design principles guided the design of the proposed framework. The framework was tested in a tiles company on the new product development process. Findings Five design principles are presented for the design of a working SPMS as follows: to integrate the horizontal and vertical dimensions of performance; to have all the relevant information in one place (package); to understand how actors contribute to the overall performance; to favor the emergence of integrating conditions for coordination; and to enrich the role of quantitative non-financial information to attain inter-functional integration. During the test of the framework, managers highlighted the increased ability to coordinate actions and the existence of double-loop learning. Research limitations/implications The model was tested in one organization. The study should be replicated in other contexts connecting the strategic alignment matrix to the budgeting and incentive systems. Originality/value Working at the interface between science and design helps to address the theory-practice gap that has been a priority in management studies for long.

Strategic management potential for process alignment in Cuban sports government organizations

“…Step II4. Improvement plan based on the Strategic Alignment Matrix Alignment Matrix, the lines of action to be worked on are determined in order to project the improvements to close the existing gaps in the strategic alignment of the objectives and processes [31].…”

Implementing reshoring: insights and principles from a longitudinal case study in the e-bike industry

“…2019), innovation management (Cocchi et al 2021), and organisation development (Romme and Damen 2007). It aims to develop artefacts such as tools (e.g., Balboni et al 2021), methods (e.g., Dosi et al 2021;Kriesi et al 2015) or conceptual principles (e.g., Vignoli et al 2019;de Vasconcelos Gomes et al 2022). A seminal paper from Holmstrong et al (2009) calls for such research in operations management: "In operations management (OM) research, recognizing and building on this complementarity is especially crucial, because problem-solving-oriented research produces the very artifacts (e.g., technologies) that empirical OM research subsequently evaluates in an attempt to build explanatory theory.…”

Modeling and measuring strategic alignment

“…Their balanced scorecard (BSC) provided templates to map the alignment at each level and to define metrics (financial, stakeholder, internal and learning) for tracking performance over time. Bertolotti et al (2019) extended Kaplan and Norton's work by providing a strategic alignment matrix that could be applied at each level of the organization to align horizontal functional key performance indicators (KPIs) with vertical business KPIs. While thorough, these procedural approaches are more suitable for long-term organizational development than for research and analysis.…”