2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-013-1776-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic and Moral Dilemmas of Corporate Philanthropy in Developing Countries: Heineken in Sub-Saharan Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Porter and Kramer (2006), leaders in both business and civil society have focused too much on the choice between them instead of focusing on the points of intersection, and they should stop thinking in terms of 'corporate social responsibility' and start thinking in terms of 'corporate social integration.' As the boundaries between public relations, community involvement, corporate social responsibility and marketing become increasingly blurred, philanthropy is becoming more integrated with other firm's activities (Sánchez, 2000) and as global competition requires firms to establish their competitive advantage from various sources (Porter and Kramer, 2002;Hess et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2010;Cantrell, Kyriazis and Noble, 2015), businesses have increasingly connected their philanthropic activities to business strategy, calling it strategic philanthropy (Cranenburgh and Arenas, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Porter and Kramer (2006), leaders in both business and civil society have focused too much on the choice between them instead of focusing on the points of intersection, and they should stop thinking in terms of 'corporate social responsibility' and start thinking in terms of 'corporate social integration.' As the boundaries between public relations, community involvement, corporate social responsibility and marketing become increasingly blurred, philanthropy is becoming more integrated with other firm's activities (Sánchez, 2000) and as global competition requires firms to establish their competitive advantage from various sources (Porter and Kramer, 2002;Hess et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2010;Cantrell, Kyriazis and Noble, 2015), businesses have increasingly connected their philanthropic activities to business strategy, calling it strategic philanthropy (Cranenburgh and Arenas, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the resource-based view, charitable contributions have the potential to enhance a firm's specific resources in the form of an improved brand name or reputation and thus contribute to a competitive advantage and increase revenues through customer loyalty (Seifert et al, 2003). When arguing that modern philanthropic and business organisations should join forces and aim to develop charity strategies that provide them with a competitive advantage (Cantrell, Kyriazis, and Noble, 2015;Cranenburgh and Arenas, 2014), Smith (1994) used the concept of Porter and Kramer's shared value (Cranenburgh and Arenas, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Strategic Philanthropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second CSR approach is to view corporate philanthropy as a contribution to society; this approach involves only a small amount of commercial interest, perhaps even without consideration of corporate profit, and thus adopts altruism as a starting point. This approach is referred to as altruistic CSR [28,29] or philanthropic responsibility [30]. However, for many firms, the use of charity work and CSR to support business strategies is increasingly common [31].…”
Section: Strategic Csr and Consumer Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, CP is increasingly considered to be a strategic dimension of CSR (e.g., Bronn & Vidaver-Cohen, 2009). Studies in this area demonstrate that CP can help to improve corporate competitiveness (Van Cranenburgh & Arenas, 2014). CP is operationalised as firms' pursuit of greater legitimacy as perceived by their external stakeholders (Chen & Chao, 2016;Wang & Qian, 2011), and accordingly, strategic CP is broadly defined as the "giving of corporate resources to address non-business community issues that also benefit the firm's strategic position and ultimately, its bottom line" (Saiia, Carroll, & Buchholtz, 2003, p. 170).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, CP has been emphasised by researchers as a means of building close connections with the community. CP helps firms to relieve institutional pressure from the community, improve their reputation, secure legitimacy and eventually increase their competitiveness (Marquis et al, 2007;Van Cranenburgh & Arenas, 2014). Therefore, the legitimacy strategy related to institutional motives provides a useful theoretical framework for examination of firms' CP behaviours at the community level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%