Strategic approaches to value investing: a systematic literature review of international studies

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present a systematic literature review (SRL) on the topic of value investing (VI) in the international studies. The purpose of this study is twofold: to highlight the strategic approaches followed in recent contributions in the field of finance connected to the main approaches of the pioneering authors (Graham and Dodd, 1934; Fisher, 1958; Fama and French, 1992; Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny, 1994) who have investigated VI; and to analyse whether scholars follow a qualitative approach in studying VI that enables companies to achieve greater competitive advantage.. Design/methodology/approach From a SLR of peer-reviewed papers covering the period 2007-2017, 45 papers were identified and analysed to present a better understanding of the adopted approaches and methodologies compared to the pioneering contributions on the topic. Findings This search found that 24 out of 45 papers specifically analyse VI. In particular, this work highlights 20 out of 24 papers that directly or indirectly, follow the approaches of “Graham and Dodd” or “Lakonishok, Shleifer and Vishny”/“Fama and French”, and 4 out of 24 that do not follow one of the main approaches identified. After the descriptive findings of the review, this paper highlights that none of the contributions takes into account qualitative analysis of a company to define whether the firm itself does or does not have a sustainable competitive advantage. Practical implications This paper suggests to international investors who intend to invest in one or more markets to revise the basic principles of VI, while also considering qualitative elements related to strategic aspects and behavioural finance. In particular, this study suggests that the investor introduce a qualitative analysis to allocate equity in value firms with a lasting competitive advantage. Originality/value This study contributes to advance the knowledge of VI from a theoretical point of view. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, it is the first study that systematises the international literature on this topic by highlighting the main contributions written in the period 2007-2017, analysing the development of the pioneering strategic approaches and examining their method of assessing firms.

International marketing studies in banking and finance: a comprehensive review and integrative framework

“…traditional narrative reviews or overview) (e.g. Dada, 2018; Vrontis et al , 2021a, b; Vrontis et al , 2020a, b; Vrontis and Christofi, 2019; Wang and Chugh, 2014), such as (Baima et al , 2020; Battisti et al , 2019): (1) increase the quality of the review procedure and results, (2) reduce the probability of making errors during the analysis, (3) increase the legitimacy of the process based on the replicability of the steps applied during the review process, (4) allow for data synthesis and literature mapping of a specific research area and (5) frequently enable a synthesis of current literature with the opportunity of developing a theoretical framework with which scholars can develop future lines of research.…”

Intellectual capital, knowledge sharing and equity crowdfunding

“…This new approach to raising money via the Internet is called crowdfunding, which allows individual founders of for-profit, social or cultural projects to request funding from multiple people (Mollick, 2014; Belleflamme et al , 2014). In recent years, the crowdfunding market has developed at triple-digit rates (Barbi and Bigelli, 2017) and research interest in crowdfunding has been increasing, even if the literature is relatively novel (Battisti et al , 2019). In particular, many scholars have distinguished the several types/models of crowdfunding (e.g.…”

“…Knowledge sharing (KS) represents a critical factor for an organization's success (Davenport and Prusak, 1998; Leonidou et al , 2018) because resources, capabilities and other intangible assets help a company to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage (e.g. Christofi et al , 2019a, b; Christofi et al , 2014; Battisti et al , 2019; Damilano et al , 2019; Guatri, 1991). In this context, intellectual capital (IC) plays an extremely valued role because the value creation process depends heavily on intangible resources and on their appropriate use (Hartono and Sheng, 2016).…”

The Effectiveness of the Value Investment Theory During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Using the Heavy Asset Industry as an Example

“…Most investors use either the value investing or the growth investing approach when investing in the stock markets [1]. The value investing approach is less risky compared to the growth investing approach, which possess the potential to give better returns in the long run [2]. Value investing has been popular for decades until the COVID-19 pandemic, which has stirred things and left investors questioning whether value investing still works during the pandemic.…”