2020
DOI: 10.1177/1750635220972127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic communications: The Pakistan military’s use of social media against terrorism

Abstract: This study examines the Pakistan military’s strategic use of social media in encouraging and sustaining public support for the ongoing war against terrorism in Pakistan. Its findings indicate that the military used significantly different types of strategic frames in response to a fast-changing, evolving security situation in the country. Framing was used strategically to facilitate public–military and people-to-people engagements. Motivational frames were the most dominant forms of communication used to gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rumi (2015) emphasizes the cooperation between provinces to root out extremism through legislation. Khan (2020) narrated that Pakistan's National Assembly passed the National Counter-Terrorism Authority Bill in 2013. Taking another step on February 25, 2014, Pakistan announced its first-ever National Internal Security Policy (NISP) based on three elements: 1) dialogue with all stakeholders; 2) isolation of terrorists from their support systems and; 3) enhancing deterrence and capacity of security apparatus to neutralize the threats to the internal security of Pakistan.…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rumi (2015) emphasizes the cooperation between provinces to root out extremism through legislation. Khan (2020) narrated that Pakistan's National Assembly passed the National Counter-Terrorism Authority Bill in 2013. Taking another step on February 25, 2014, Pakistan announced its first-ever National Internal Security Policy (NISP) based on three elements: 1) dialogue with all stakeholders; 2) isolation of terrorists from their support systems and; 3) enhancing deterrence and capacity of security apparatus to neutralize the threats to the internal security of Pakistan.…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been categorized into two extremes, i.e., whether they are more religious in thought and practice (tilted towards fundamentalism) or more secular. Khan (2011) observed that Pakistan is facing multifaceted threats -regionally, internationally, and domestically to its human security. A few of these arise due to intolerance, bigotry, militancy and terrorism both in the rural as well as in urban areas of the country and also because of its historical relationship with regional and nonregional powers that led to sectarianism, ethnicity, and financial insecurity in Pakistan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The public display in online platforms has allowed for the investigation (as well as the adoption in self-representation strategies) of gendered perspectives (Stengel and Shim, 2019; Wright, 2019), the redefinition of military masculinities (Jester, 2021), or the visual construction of military bodies (Baker, 2020). Normalization is also demonstrated by the military’s commitment to strategically use ‘civil’ dialogue with users to counter or disclose traditional issues, such as terrorism (Khan and Pratt, 2020).…”
Section: Platforms and The Military Between Normalization And Conflic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand for this issue is indicated by a wide range of modern studies on this issue. For instance, M. Khan and K. Pratt investigated the composition of strategic communications through social media, their potential in countering terrorism, specifically through the use of frames (Khan & Pratt, 2022). R. Arcos and H. Smith highlight the threats of using information operations by hostile authoritarian actors aimed at spreading discord between partner countries and interfering in democratic processes (Arcos & Smith, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%