2014
DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-14-00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic contracting practices to improve procurement of health commodities

Abstract: Practices such as flexible, pre-established framework agreements can improve timeliness and cost of procurement and help improve commodity security. Addressing legislative barriers and building technical capacity in contract management may facilitate the use of such practices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Framework contracts are already enacted in countries like Ghana, Kenya, and Zambia, while in others such as Mozambique legislative barriers still prevent their enactment. 223 Even where procurement itself is effective, post-procurement management of commodities is critical, as the experience of Ghana's CMS illustrates.…”
Section: Section 6 Access To Essential Health Commoditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Framework contracts are already enacted in countries like Ghana, Kenya, and Zambia, while in others such as Mozambique legislative barriers still prevent their enactment. 223 Even where procurement itself is effective, post-procurement management of commodities is critical, as the experience of Ghana's CMS illustrates.…”
Section: Section 6 Access To Essential Health Commoditiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of strategic purchasing in developed countries indicate that in a country like the US, through strategic purchasing contracts, the price of four expensive drugs is 24% lower than the average price offered by drug suppliers. [ 10 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the UK a ‘framework’ route might be equally successful, especially with limited scope of requirements, since it is likely to cost less. While in general, framework agreements are a useful and effective approach for smaller purchasing decisions, these are usually not indicated for major procurements such as comprehensive EPR systems 5. The reasons for this include the fact that not all EPR providers may be available through the framework process, thus reducing the scope of potential vendors, and frameworks are based on preselected criteria, which may be beneficial in specific circumstances but when considering enterprise EPR solutions, the scale and complexity of requirements may be incompatible with a framework approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%