2002
DOI: 10.1111/1521-9488.t01-1-00266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Culture and National Security Policy

Abstract: Once considered academically unfashionable, studies of the importance of culture and ideas have gained greater attention in the post–Cold War era. Particularly surprising has been the emerging consensus in national security policy studies that culture may significantly affect grand strategy and state behavior. I chart the development of these ideas through several generations of scholarship, both inside and outside the discipline, and explore contemporary arguments about strategic culture and state behavior li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The third generation, emerging in the mid-1990s with scholars such as Alastair Iain Johnston (1995), tried to develop falsifiable theories of strategic culture. In recent years, a fourth generation, based on the tenets of social constructivism, has appeared, focusing primarily on competing subcultures on the domestic level and on strategic cultural change (Lantis 2002, Libel 2016.…”
Section: Strategic Culture and Historical Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third generation, emerging in the mid-1990s with scholars such as Alastair Iain Johnston (1995), tried to develop falsifiable theories of strategic culture. In recent years, a fourth generation, based on the tenets of social constructivism, has appeared, focusing primarily on competing subcultures on the domestic level and on strategic cultural change (Lantis 2002, Libel 2016.…”
Section: Strategic Culture and Historical Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notas 1. Depois de Snyder, outros autores, como Booth (1979), Gray (1986;2007), Johnston (1996Johnston ( , 1999, Lantis (2002) This article aims to challenge the binary logic that pervades discussions about the impact of Turkish membership on the European Union's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). It argues that any assessment of such impact must take into account existing divisions within Europe and within Turkey in terms of security culture.…”
Section: Conclusãomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W latach czterdziestych i piêaedziesi¹tych XX wieku w antropologii i socjologii pojawi³ siê nurt studiów nad charakterem narodowym. W ramach tego kierunku badañ starano siê znaleŸae powi¹zania miêdzy kultur¹ a zachowaniem pañstw, w oparciu o modele antropologiczne 7 . Jedn¹ z najbardziej znanych i wp³ywowych prac tego nurtu by³a ksi¹¿ka Chryzantema i miecz.…”
Section: Prekursorzy Koncepcji Kultury Strategicznejunclassified