2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2540720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Formation of Homogeneous Bargaining Networks

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agents in these models have a preference ordering over the set of networks. Examples include firms' profit when forming R&D networks (Goyal and Joshi, 2003), individuals' utility from communicating with others (Harmsen-van Hout et al, 2013) or receiving information from others (Olaizola and Valenciano, 2014), agents' payoff from bargaining on a network (Gauer and Hellmann, 2017), or researchers' scientific output from collaborating with co-authors (Rêgo and dos Santos, 2019). Since the structure of interaction, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agents in these models have a preference ordering over the set of networks. Examples include firms' profit when forming R&D networks (Goyal and Joshi, 2003), individuals' utility from communicating with others (Harmsen-van Hout et al, 2013) or receiving information from others (Olaizola and Valenciano, 2014), agents' payoff from bargaining on a network (Gauer and Hellmann, 2017), or researchers' scientific output from collaborating with co-authors (Rêgo and dos Santos, 2019). Since the structure of interaction, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%