“…Finally, the RGT may be better at accessing a manager's underlying reality than a depth interview, owing to the possibility of interviewer bias and subtleties of the thought captured by the technique (Rogers & Ryals, 2007;Ketchen et al, 2008). Finally, RGT is scalable (Kruskal & Wish, 1978b), supporting studies with small samples (Wright, 2004) as well as studies employing large sample sizes (Dagnino & Cinici, 2016;Wright, 2015;Hodgkinson & Healey, 2008;Brown, 1992). Literature provides examples of RGT used with samples as small as five subjects (Malmström et al, 2015), samples from 10 to 50 interviewees (e.g., Rogers & Ryals, 2007;Calori et al, 1994;Bingham & Eisenhardt, 2011), and samples of over 200 respondents (Hodgkinson, 2005).…”