2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic importance of green water in international crop trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
127
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
127
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it is well established in the literature that, over time, international food trade has favored more efficient use of water resources, at the global level (e.g. Aldaya, Allan, & Hoekstra, 2010;Chapagain, Hoekstra, & Savenije, 2006;De Fraiture, Cai, Amarasinghe, Rosegrant, & Molden, 2004;Oki & Kanae, 2004). This fact, together with our conclusions, highlights the important role of international trade in driving the efficient allocation of water resources.…”
Section: Policy Implications and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Moreover, it is well established in the literature that, over time, international food trade has favored more efficient use of water resources, at the global level (e.g. Aldaya, Allan, & Hoekstra, 2010;Chapagain, Hoekstra, & Savenije, 2006;De Fraiture, Cai, Amarasinghe, Rosegrant, & Molden, 2004;Oki & Kanae, 2004). This fact, together with our conclusions, highlights the important role of international trade in driving the efficient allocation of water resources.…”
Section: Policy Implications and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Green water is by far the main source of water used for wheat cultivation in all countries. The water footprint of wheat is overwhelmingly green as its production is dominantly rainfed, as confirmed by other studies [39,40]. It is important to distinguish green and blue water resources, as they fundamentally differ in terms of opportunity costs and for informing food and water policy-making.…”
Section: Environmental Products Declarationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It is important to distinguish green and blue water resources, as they fundamentally differ in terms of opportunity costs and for informing food and water policy-making. Compared to blue water, green water has a far lower opportunity cost, as it cannot be easily reallocated to uses other than agriculture or vegetation, and its use has relatively few externalities with respect to irrigation [40,41]. Using green water for agricultural production is generally efficient in terms of opportunity cost, because its use for vegetation growth generally yields lower economic value than crop production [42].…”
Section: Environmental Products Declarationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Aldaya et al (2009) then specified soil water from irrigation, either from ground or surface sources, to be classified as blue water, which proceeding studies have corroborated (Hanasaki et al 2010;Hoekstra et al 2012;Montesinos et al 2011;Zoumides et al 2013). Virtual water content includes both blue and green water, with blue water as the most 'manageable' component, leaving considerations of green water efficiency often overlooked (Aldaya et al 2009;Falkenmark and Rockstrom 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though useful for general, widespread comparisons, the distinction between blue and green water were not made and the blue water sources were not identified. Aldaya et al (2009) estimated the proportions of blue and green water in the VWC of corn, soybean and wheat, exported from USA, Canada, Argentina and Australia. Green water of a crop was taken equal to the lower of either the effective rainfall or the crop water requirement, and blue water was equal to the irrigation water used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%