Strategic Information Systems Planning (SISP)

Abstract

This study examines the use of formal Strategic Information Systems Planning (SISP) approaches and methodologies in Australia. The authors analyze the relationships between SISP success, SISP objectives, company size/type and SISP approaches and methodologies. The authors find that the most popular methodologies are not the most successful. Emerging methodologies, such as Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Information Engineering, could be considered for improving the success of SISP. They also find that a combination of SISP approaches is more successful than the implementation of any one approach. This can be interpreted that the boundary lines that distinguish theoretical approaches are blurred and that SISP theory needs a new way of thinking to stay relevant for practice. In addition, many findings of significant importance to SISP practitioners, in the context of various industries, are presented.

Penggunaan Multi Metode Untuk Strategis Perencanaan Sistem Informasi Pada Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat

“…Perencanaan strategis sistem informasi dan teknologi informasi (SI/TI) sangan dibutuhkan dalam menentukan kesuksesan suatu penerapan sistem informasi dan teknologi informasi (Togaf, 2016). Perencanaan strategis dapat berjalan efektif, jika implementasi perencanaan strategis dilaksanakan secara berkesinambungan untuk memastikan penyesuaian proses bisnis sesuai dengan perkembangan teknologi (Pita, Cheong and Corbitt, 2014). Manfaat perencanaan strategis yaitu untuk menghasilkan program prioritas SI/TI yang sesuai dengan proses bisnis, majemen yang efektif dan efisien dan mengidentifikasi keunggulan kompetitif serta pengembangan bisnis ke depan (Ariyanto W and Samopa, 2013).…”

Strategic Information Systems Planning Practices and Performance of Government Agencies

“…Past studies have also indicated that it is not appropriate for organizations to adopt a standard SISP process based on only a certain approach and methodology. Findings from the studies by Al-Aboud (2011), Pollack (2010) and Pita, Cheong and Corbitt (2008) have suggested that there is no one best way of adopting SISP in organizations. According to these studies, since organizations differ from each other in terms of their resources, capabilities and requirements, each organization should attempt to identify the approach and methodology that best suit its requirements and purpose of adopting SISP.…”

“…More specifically, the review of previous studies appear to suggest that past research primarily addressed issues such as SISP practices, SISP process, SISP success, SISP methodologies, success factors in SISP, strategic alignment in SISP, SISP approaches and SISP implementation (Khani, Md Nor, Samani, and Hakimpoor, 2012;Gufroni, 2011;Khani, Md Noor, Bahrami, 2011;Issa-Salwe, Sharif and Ahmed, 2011;Al-Aboud, 2011;Pollack, 2010;Md Basir and Norzaidi, 2009;Abu Bakar, Suhaimi and Hussain, 2009;Pita, Cheong and Corbitt, 2008;Teubneur, 2007).…”

Critical success factors of strategic information systems planning: a Delphi approach

“…Recent works within IS planning and delivery discuss IT/IS-business strategic alignment (Coltman et al, 2015;Gerow et al, 2015;Queiroz, 2017), digital strategy and innovation (Chatterjee et al, 2020;Teubner and Stockhinger, 2020;Yeow et al, 2018), IT capabilities (Khani et al, 2011), IT governance (Kude et al, 2017), human resource planning (Oehlhorn et al, 2020), IS planning process and effectiveness (Sepehri, 2010), the role of formal communication in IS projects (Tsai and Compeau, 2021) and IS planning success (Shimada et al, 2018). Most of these studies do not focus on developing nations where IS resources are scarce (Boateng, 2020).…”