1994
DOI: 10.5465/256804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Planning and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of More Than Two Decades of Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
345
3
17

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
19
345
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Within those parameters, a consensus is apparent among researchers on this topic. This consensus is of a small but significant correlation between planning and performance, 29 that substantive external contingencies have little impact 30 and that more sophisticated methodologies have produced stronger links than earlier work. 31 Further, this work makes clear that the advantages of strategic planning are not only financial but lie also in less tangible 'process' benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within those parameters, a consensus is apparent among researchers on this topic. This consensus is of a small but significant correlation between planning and performance, 29 that substantive external contingencies have little impact 30 and that more sophisticated methodologies have produced stronger links than earlier work. 31 Further, this work makes clear that the advantages of strategic planning are not only financial but lie also in less tangible 'process' benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These inconsistencies have even led some writers to reject formal planning as the 'one' best way to plan (Mintzberg, 1994). One of the arguments presented about these findings in the strategy performance relationship was the neglect of strategy implementation (Miller and Cardinal, 1994;Brews and Hunt, 1999;Phillips and Moutinho, 2000;Hrebiniak, 2005Hrebiniak, , 2006Whittington and Cailluet, 2008). This trend is still observed in more recent publications on strategy management and strategy processes (Belmondo and Sargis-Roussel, 2015;Paroutis et al, 2015;Thomas and Ambrosini, 2015) where papers tend to examine strategy formation and strategy development, rather than its implementation.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramanujan, Venkatraman and Camillus (1986) found that a key effect of formal planning is that it alters specific elements of the overall strategic decision process hence associated with adopting key steps in decision process. For Miller and Cardinal (1994), planning was found to strongly and positively relate to growth in studies in which industry effect were controlled, an informant source of performance data was used, planning was defined as not requiring written documentation and the quality of assessment strategy was high while explicit strategies are dysfunctional as they channel attention and behavior to specific plans thereby driving out important innovations and creativity. Boyne et al, (2003) observes that planning is believed to lead to positive organizational outcome due to the clarity of objectives, provision of framework to allocate resources and communication to all staff.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%