2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1625(01)00139-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic planning in public R&D organizations for agribusiness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting example is the system adopted by the USDA-ARS, which has physical bases (laboratories) at universities, working in an integrated manner on specific research topics [24]. In addition, the programmatic figure of portfolios is very welcome because it replaces the current strategy of decentralized units with national missions for the coordination of large product chains, as well as making it possible to act on transversal themes in various regions of the country [27].…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting example is the system adopted by the USDA-ARS, which has physical bases (laboratories) at universities, working in an integrated manner on specific research topics [24]. In addition, the programmatic figure of portfolios is very welcome because it replaces the current strategy of decentralized units with national missions for the coordination of large product chains, as well as making it possible to act on transversal themes in various regions of the country [27].…”
Section: Discussion and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embrapa infrastructure of research, development and innovation (RD&I) ramifies into the inner Brazilian regions as departments or decentralized research units whose designations have been associated to national products of large importance (Product), edaphic-climatic conditions or biome (Ecoregional) or other exceptional knowledge (Thematic) [24][25][26]. In addition to administrative and assistance work, the main occupations are Analysts engaged in lab, field or administrative support, and Researchers committed to a shared RD&I agenda.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This often happens due to the lack of knowledge regarding the importance of information obtained by means of accountancy, and how this information can help in decision-taking (Abib et al, 2015;Freitas Filho et al, 2002).…”
Section: Rural Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freitas Filho, Paez and Goedert (2002) reported that there is increasing evidence that the planning of public agricultural research and development (R&D) organizations must be based on systematic procedures to capture uncertainties and complexities associated with the future of their mission area and incorporate them into the decision-making process both at strategic and operational levels. As a first step, key issues that emerge are: ''what be the science and technology (S&T) needs for the agribusiness sector in the future?''…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the agribusiness sector, the questions raised by Freitas Filho, Paez and Goedert (2002) are recurring to R&D organizations that develop research to the most diverse industrial sectors. Thus, this work aims to contribute to the literature presenting a systematic method to answer the same questions for an R&D organization that develop research for manufacturing sector: ''what be the science and technology (S&T) needs for the manufacturing sector in the future?''…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%