2016
DOI: 10.5430/jbar.v5n1p23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategic Thinking and Organization Performance: Study of Nigeria Firms

Abstract: This study examines strategic thinking as it affects firm performance in the Nigeria context. Several studies on strategic thinking and firm performance have either revealed a positive relationship or negative relationship with firm performance of which most of these studies are carried out in developed countries. This paper therefore investigates this topic using the Nigerian business environment which has its own unique quality which differs from what is obtained from other parts of the world and as such the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salih and Alnaji (2014) explored the impact of ST on performance amongst insurance firms in Jordan and found a significant association between them. Alatailat et al (2019) explored this relationship amongst commercial banks in Jordan, again finding a significant positive relationship, as did Ibrahim Olaniyi and Lucas (2016) in Nigeria.…”
Section: Strategic Thinking As Moderatormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Salih and Alnaji (2014) explored the impact of ST on performance amongst insurance firms in Jordan and found a significant association between them. Alatailat et al (2019) explored this relationship amongst commercial banks in Jordan, again finding a significant positive relationship, as did Ibrahim Olaniyi and Lucas (2016) in Nigeria.…”
Section: Strategic Thinking As Moderatormentioning
confidence: 92%
“…From the survey, we could identify only 44 empirical studies that were considered to conduct the meta-analysis and the rest were conceptual frameworks and case studies. Methodologies, such as regression analysis (Haans et al, 2016;Mark et al, 2008), correlation analysis (Aiman- Smith and Green, 2002;Coeurderoy et al, 2014;Ibrahim Olaniyi and Elumah Lucas, 2016;Al-Qatamin and Esam, 2018;Dhir and Dhir, 2015, 2018, structural equation modelling (Moon, 2010;Hamed et al, 2015;Arayesh et al, 2017), confirmatory factor analysis (Shahbazzadeh et al, 2016), analytical hierarchy process (Huang and Keskar, 2007) and content analysis (Cooper, 2012). These were the widely used methodologies in the studies from the area of strategic thinking.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Kazmi and Naaranoja, (2015) "Strategic thinking is considered a significant business process by management experts due to its appeal to strengthen organizational performance management and its effectiveness". 20 Ibrahim Olaniyi and Elumah Lucas (2016) "Strategic thinking is seen as the generation and application of distinctive business ideas and opportunities intended to create a competitive advantage for a firm or business". 21 Ali ( 2016)…”
Section: Corresponding Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last component of thinking in time is unceasing evaluation, which oscillates between the past, the future and the present; it considers a prospective change by limiting, expediting, accepting or countering the benefit of such a change (Lawrence, 1999). In addition, an organization can build a solid base where it can respond to changes and apply entrepreneurial behavior (Olaniyi and Lucas, 2016). If all these components are considered when thinking in time, then the organization is able to learn from past mistakes, effect changes in the present and project into the future.…”
Section: High Performance Work Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%