2022
DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2022.2028478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies and challenges of sustainable development in Eurasia

Abstract: While supporting the values and goals of sustainable development at the international level, states might employ very different strategies at the national level. The goal of this Forward and of special issue is two-fold. First, it aims to advance our understanding of different strategies, paying special attention to China and Russia at global, national, and sub-national levels. Thus, analysis of their strategies across different levels presents a more rounded picture. The second goal is to identify at least a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite the employment of "environmental discourse," and legally promised support to Indigenous peoples (Russian Federation, 1999), there were no efficient implementations of specific policies for sustainable development or of Indigenous people's rights to land and resources, self-determination, and culture in their homeland in the Arctic (Garbis et al, 2023;Stepanov et al, 2023;Vladimirova, 2023b). The important role of legitimacy and rhetorical tools in autocratic regionalism has been studied elsewhere (Obydenkova, 2022b;. This article contributes an innovative analysis of autocracies-led regional governance focusing on the nexus of state-imposed militarization and society in the Arctic as well as the most recent socio-political transformations in this environmentally fragile region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the employment of "environmental discourse," and legally promised support to Indigenous peoples (Russian Federation, 1999), there were no efficient implementations of specific policies for sustainable development or of Indigenous people's rights to land and resources, self-determination, and culture in their homeland in the Arctic (Garbis et al, 2023;Stepanov et al, 2023;Vladimirova, 2023b). The important role of legitimacy and rhetorical tools in autocratic regionalism has been studied elsewhere (Obydenkova, 2022b;. This article contributes an innovative analysis of autocracies-led regional governance focusing on the nexus of state-imposed militarization and society in the Arctic as well as the most recent socio-political transformations in this environmentally fragile region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This thematic issue advances our understanding of the changes and challenges that have taken place in ARG, from historical and modern perspectives, by focusing on different aspects of environmental governance (e.g., the management of marine living resources and seal populations), IP, and nation-states (e.g., Russia and China), thus contributing to comparative environmental studies (Demchuk et al, 2022;Hanaček & Martinez-Alier, 2022;Libman & Obydenkova, 2014;Obydenkova, 2022d;Tosun & Shyrokykh, 2022). A few overlapping themes reappear across some of the articles: the role of historical lessons, the importance of inclusiveness in environmental governance, and the role of diffusion and learning across borders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the growing policy attention to the Arctic and the climate change taking place in the region, Russia seemed to have been inefficient to develop a viable strategy coping with this challenge in the region (Obydenkova 2022c). It may be partly explained by priorities of economic and security benefits, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underestimation of climate risks in the Arctic policy of the Russian Federation can be explained by the general neglect of the climate factor in long-term planning of Russia's development for several decades (Kokorin and Korppoo 2013;Obydenkova 2022c;Makarov 2022), though in recent years Russia's climate policy, especially its mitigationrelated dimension, has boosted. As a participant of the Paris Agreement, Russia pledged to tackle the climate problem and approved its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) in 2020, which implies that, by 2030, Russia will cut its greenhouse gas emissions by at least 30% from 1990 level.…”
Section: Russian Arctic and Climate Policies: Are There Enough Synergy?mentioning
confidence: 99%