Strategies for Accurate Cell Type Identification in CODEX Multiplexed Imaging Data

Abstract

Multiplexed imaging is a recently developed and powerful single-cell biology research tool. However, it presents new sources of technical noise that are distinct from other types of single-cell data, necessitating new practices for single-cell multiplexed imaging processing and analysis, particularly regarding cell-type identification. Here we created single-cell multiplexed imaging datasets by performing CODEX on four sections of the human colon (ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid) using a panel of 47 oligonucleotide-barcoded antibodies. After cell segmentation, we implemented five different normalization techniques crossed with four unsupervised clustering algorithms, resulting in 20 unique cell-type annotations for the same dataset. We generated two standard annotations: hand-gated cell types and cell types produced by over-clustering with spatial verification. We then compared these annotations at four levels of cell-type granularity. First, increasing cell-type granularity led to decreased labeling accuracy; therefore, subtle phenotype annotations should be avoided at the clustering step. Second, accuracy in cell-type identification varied more with normalization choice than with clustering algorithm. Third, unsupervised clustering better accounted for segmentation noise during cell-type annotation than hand-gating. Fourth, Z-score normalization was generally effective in mitigating the effects of noise from single-cell multiplexed imaging. Variation in cell-type identification will lead to significant differential spatial results such as cellular neighborhood analysis; consequently, we also make recommendations for accurately assigning cell-type labels to CODEX multiplexed imaging.

Dissecting Tumor-Immune Microenvironment in Breast Cancer at a Spatial and Multiplex Resolution

“…Smaller antibody panels may overlook specific subpopulations and may be unable to characterize the whole spectrum of immune cell dysfunction or the interplay between different immune regulators [116]. In contrast, high-plex methods may provide a more global characterization of TIME; however, increased complexity generates difficulties regarding panel validation, intensity profile, cell segmentation and phenotyping [39,117]. In addition, the sensitivity of MS-IHC approaches compared with single IHC is yet to be determined [38].…”

Beyond pathologist-level annotation of large-scale cancer histology for semantic segmentation using immunofluorescence restaining

“…Other experimental methods exist to identify multiple cell types simultaneously in a tissue section, such as highly multiplexed IF 23 , imaging mass spectrometry 24 , and spatial transcriptomics 25 . These methods are more accurate than our approach and can identify cells that cannot be detected in H&E-stained sections.…”

Integrated cytometry with machine learning applied to high-content imaging of human kidney tissue for in-situ cell classification and neighborhood analysis

“…Practically, with progress in multiscale and hierarchical image formats this may be greatly simplified soon 32 . Furthermore, multiple datasets can be aligned into a single analysis with VTEA using normalization and mapping strategies but testing and adequately addressing batch effects needs to be established across image datasets 33 . One Possibility is to use cell-centric neighborhood analysis, which is, by default, normalized spatially for a common set of cell classifications, to combine disparate imaging datasets.…”