Strategies for Implementing Occupational eMental Health Interventions: Scoping Review

Abstract

Background The implementation of eMental health interventions, especially in the workplace, is a complex process. Therefore, learning from existing implementation strategies is imperative to ensure improvements in the adoption, development, and scalability of occupational eMental health (OeMH) interventions. However, the implementation strategies used for these interventions are often undocumented or inadequately reported and have not been systematically gathered across implementations in a way that can serve as a much-needed guide for researchers. Objective The objective of this scoping review was to identify implementation strategies relevant to the uptake of OeMH interventions that target employees and detail the associated barriers and facilitation measures. Methods A scoping review was conducted. The descriptive synthesis was guided by the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Results A total of 31 of 32,916 (0.09%) publications reporting the use of the web-, smartphone-, telephone-, and email-based OeMH interventions were included. In all, 98 implementation strategies, 114 barriers, and 131 facilitators were identified. The synthesis of barriers and facilitators produced 19 facilitation measures that provide initial recommendations for improving the implementation of OeMH interventions. Conclusions This scoping review represents one of the first steps in a research agenda aimed at improving the implementation of OeMH interventions by systematically selecting, shaping, evaluating, and reporting implementation strategies. There is a dire need for improved reporting of implementation strategies and combining common implementation frameworks with more technology-centric implementation frameworks to fully capture the complexities of eHealth implementation. Future research should investigate a wider range of common implementation outcomes for OeMH interventions that also focus on a wider set of common mental health problems in the workplace. This scoping review’s findings can be critically leveraged by discerning decision-makers to improve the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of OeMH interventions.

Pandemic Preparedness among Big Energy Companies: Call to Research and Action

“…Moreover, ensuring the health of workers means retaining optimal results of productivity and the achievement of the company's objectives. Businesses can make an important contribution to improving and maintaining the wellbeing of workers, both in terms of physical and mental health, which is an increasing priority from a public health perspective [33,34].…”

Digital health integration for noncommunicable diseases: Comprehensive process mapping for full‐life‐cycle management

“…Despite appreciable advancements, however, digital health users and researchers face persistent limitations and barriers. Criticisms highlight mainly the technology‐centric approaches taken, without adequate consideration of user demands 8,9 . Moreover, many interventions focused on single technologies, traditional acute incident management, or disease‐specific silos, 10,11 diverging from the World Health Organization's (WHO's) emphasis on holistic system and service integration 12 .…”

Effectiveness of an online text-based stress management program for employees who work in micro- and small-sized enterprises: A randomized controlled trial

“…Still, no study has developed an internet-based mental health program and assessed its effectiveness and implementation outcomes in MSEs ( Hogg et al, 2021 ). Moreover, in the nearly 25 years of research efforts with digital interventions, the implementation of effective programs has not always been successfully documented, ( Andersson et al, 2019 ; Andersson and Carlbring, 2022 ) including in occupational health settings ( Bernard et al, 2022 ). For example, the “Business in Mind” Project targeting small enterprises in Australia reported difficulty taking mental health interventions into the business community ( Martin et al, 2015 ).…”