Strategies for improving safety performance of repair, maintenance, minor alteration and addition (RMAA) works

Abstract

Purpose -Managing and maintaining infrastructure assets are one of the indispensible tasks for many government agencies to preserve the nations' economic viability and social welfare. To reduce the expenditures over the life-cycle of an infrastructure asset and extend the period for which the asset performs effectively, proper repair and maintenance are essential. While repair, maintenance, minor alteration and addition (RMAA) sector is expanding in many developed cities, occurrences of fatalities and injuries in this sector are also soaring. The purposes of this paper are to identify and then evaluate the various strategies for improving the safety performance of RMAA works. Design/methodology/approach -Semi-structured interviews and two rounds of Delphi survey were conducted for data collection. Findings -Raising safety awareness of RMAA workers and selecting contractors with a good record of safety performance are the two most important strategies to improve the safety performance in this sector. Technology innovations and a pay-for-safety scheme are regarded as the two least important strategies. Originality/value -The paper highlights possible ways to enhance safety of the rather under-explored RMAA sector in the construction industry.

Critical success factors for implementing building information modeling and sustainability practices in construction projects: A Delphi survey

“…The targeted respondents must fulfill some set of criteria before their invitations, and these include (a) the respondent must have a broad level of experience and leadership in the construction industry; (b) the respondent must have utilized BIM and implemented sustainability practices in previous or current projects; and (c) the respondent should be well acquainted with BIM and sustainability concepts as well as a robust understanding of their interrelationships.Moreover,Giel and Issa (2016) noted that a 2-3 round of Delphi survey is sufficient to attain the required consensus from the expert panel. Hence, this study adopted a two-round Delphi survey over a 5-month period involving 14 experts Hon, Chan, and Chan (2011). noted that a Delphi expert panel must consist of a minimum of seven respondents, andTuroff (1970) caps the size of an expert panel at 50 members.…”

Exploring Typical and Atypical Safety Climate Perceptions of Practitioners in the Repair, Maintenance, Minor Alteration and Addition (RMAA) Sector in Hong Kong

“…Some may be over-confident with their experience and thus neglect the importance of safety compliance. Whatever the reason may be, it is suggested that the government or the Occupational Safety and Health Council should put more effort into uplifting the safety awareness and knowledge of RMAA practitioners at the subcontractors’ level [30]. …”

Identification, Selection and Prioritization of Key Performance Indicators for the Improvement of Occupational Health (Case Study: An Automotive Company)

“…The semi-structured interview was conducted in order to obtain the answers to the pre-defined questions and to provide an opportunity for the specialists to express their experiences of health performance assessment if they wished. Semistructured interviewing has been used in various OHS research areas [22][23][24]. The specialists were selected through non-random purposive sampling (predetermined), and the individuals who were in the best position to provide the required information were selected.…”