Strategies for More Effective Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in HIV Programmatic Scale-Up in Resource-Limited Settings: Implications for Health Systems Strengthening

Abstract

Program monitoring and evaluation (M&E) has the potential to be a cornerstone of health systems strengthening and of evidence-informed implementation and scale-up of HIV-related services in resource-limited settings. We discuss common challenges to M&E systems used in the rapid scale-up of HIV services as well as innovations that may have relevance to systems used to monitor, evaluate, and inform health systems strengthening. These include (1) Web-based applications with decentralized data entry and real-time access to summary reporting; (2) timely feedback of information to site and district staff; (3) site-level integration of traditionally siloed program area indicators; (4) longitudinal tracking of program and site characteristics; (5) geographic information systems; and (6) use of routinely collected aggregate data for epidemiologic analysis and operations research. Although conventionally used in the context of vertical programs, these approaches can form a foundation on which data relevant to other health services and systems can be layered, including prevention services, primary care, maternal-child health, and chronic disease management. Guiding principles for sustainable national M&E systems include country-led development and ownership, support for national programs and policies, interoperability, and employment of an open-source approach to software development.

Implementation of a health management mentoring program: year-1 evaluation of its impact on health system strengthening in Zambézia Province, Mozambique

“…Strong systems are essential to achieving improved clinical outcomes because they are able to holistically and equitably respond to a population's healthcare needs through coordinated efforts of people, institutions, and resources (8,9). The complex, multifaceted, and highly contextual nature of health systems poses challenges for their quantitative evaluation; as such, the World Health Organization (WHO) has increasingly emphasized the need for innovative techniques for program monitoring using system-wide approaches (10)(11)(12) (21). However, many of these SDSMAS administrative personnel are clinicians without formal training for such managerial duties, but were brought to their current roles as a result of the dearth in HRs stemming from both external and internal brain drain across the Mozambican health sector (23).…”

Improving public health information: a data quality intervention in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

“…[1][2][3][4] As countries report their progress towards achieving the United Nations Millennium Development Goals, the need for highquality data has never been greater. 5,6 Furthermore, funding and support for public health activities, such as immunization programmes, remain contingent on demonstrating coverage using routine statistics.…”

Application of mHealth to improve service delivery and health outcomes: Opportunities and challenges

“…Data collected by TRACnet is used for a variety of purposes including monitoring program expansion and progress, driving performance-based incentive payments to health centres, delivering lab results to facilitate early infant diagnosis, monitoring pharmaceutical supplies, and providing donor reporting (Nyemazi, 2011). The system includes a national interoperable electronic health system, rollout of electronic management records and data input from CHWs through solar-powered mobile phones (Gerber et al, 2010;Nash et al, 2009). …”