2022
DOI: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2022.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for prevention and treatment of spinal cord ischemia during F/BEVAR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cerebrospinal fluid drainage was the most effective method for the prevention and treatment of paraplegia after endovascular aortic repair. [ 18 ] The spinal perfusion pressure was equal to the difference between mean arterial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. [ 19 – 21 ] Early cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces the cerebrospinal fluid pressure and increases the spinal perfusion pressure to relieve symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebrospinal fluid drainage was the most effective method for the prevention and treatment of paraplegia after endovascular aortic repair. [ 18 ] The spinal perfusion pressure was equal to the difference between mean arterial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid pressure. [ 19 – 21 ] Early cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces the cerebrospinal fluid pressure and increases the spinal perfusion pressure to relieve symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, utilizing the TF approach may be a preferable option whenever possible to minimize the risk of cerebral embolic events and stroke [54] . Despite theoretical concerns regarding a potential increased risk of stroke associated with right UE access compared to left UE access, studies have shown no significant difference [55] .…”
Section: Access Vesselmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TASP has shown benefit when compared with single-stage repair; a study of 83 patients who underwent branched endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with or without TASP demonstrated a significantly lower rate of SCI with TASP ( 13 ). However, this practice has not been investigated in US centers, owing to two primary reasons; the first being that it has not been compared with conventional means of staged repair, and the second is the theoretical risks with TASP, namely coagulopathy related to high flow endoleaks, and the risk of rupture ( 14 ).…”
Section: Anatomy Of Spinal Cord Perfusionmentioning
confidence: 99%