Strategies for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Patients With CIED Implantation: A Literature Review

Vasilev, Strahil

doi:10.7759/cureus.13021

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…CIED implantation as well as rates of infections have been increasing rapidly over the past decade, and the rate of infections has been increasing disproportionately to the increased rate of CIED implantation [13,14,15]. A regional study conducted by Sadeghi et [16].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Rate of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection at a Tertiary Hospital in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Khubrani¹,

AL-Ghamdi²,

Alsubaie³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionCardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are long-term cardiac treatments that address a variety of cardiac diseases. In the recent years, a steady growth has been noticed in CIEDs, mainly due to expanding indications for their usage. Possible device-related infection, whether pocket or systemic, which leads to high morbidity and mortality, is one of the most worrying complications. In addition, there are limited studies conducted on the topic of CIED infection rate and their clinical presentation both regionally and locally. MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed the medical records of all patients with CIEDs who presented to our medical center (implanted, followed up, or referred to our hospital) between January 2016 and January 2019.The medical records were extracted from the BestCare electronic medical records system (ezCaretech Co, Seoul, Korea). All consecutive patients were included as we had no exclusion criteria. ResultsDuring the three years of the study period, a total of 612 patients with CIEDs were identified at our medical center. Among this cohort, 436 subjects (71.2%) were male and 176 (28.8%) were female. Thirty-four patients experienced device-related infections from among the total patient population (n = 612) who presented with CIEDs between January 2016 and January 2019, for a total rate of 5.6%. Of the infected patients, 29 (85%) presented with local infections and five (15%) presented with systemic infections. ConclusionThe infection rate of 5.6% observed in this study was higher than expected. Therefore, we conclude that action should be taken to reduce infection rates at our medical center to at least that seen in prior studies or below that, if possible. Moreover, we found that CIED infections were often caused by Staphylococcus species and commonly affected the elderly and patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes and hypertension. Most of the identified cases were local infections, although systemic infections were common in those with renal disease. Further studies are needed to control the risk factors and to better understand the role of antibiotics, antiseptic prophylaxis, and other methods in avoiding CIED infection and associated complications.

show abstract