2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for Prevention, Protection, and Repair of Bridge Girders Vulnerable to Over-height Vehicle Impacts: A State-of-the-Art Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the method used in reference, 36 here, a girder with a damage index value falling in the interval D = 0-0.2, D = 0.2-0.4, D = 0.4-0.6, and D = 0.6-1.0 are defined as minor damage, moderate damage, severe damage and failure, respectively. Furthermore, according to the ideas in referernce, [37][38][39] the principle used to distinguish between moderate damage and severe damage depends on whether the bridge superstructure can operate normally through appropriate structural repairs. If the bridge superstructure can continue to function normally after comprehensive structural repairs, the damage of the girder would be moderate.…”
Section: Damage Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the method used in reference, 36 here, a girder with a damage index value falling in the interval D = 0-0.2, D = 0.2-0.4, D = 0.4-0.6, and D = 0.6-1.0 are defined as minor damage, moderate damage, severe damage and failure, respectively. Furthermore, according to the ideas in referernce, [37][38][39] the principle used to distinguish between moderate damage and severe damage depends on whether the bridge superstructure can operate normally through appropriate structural repairs. If the bridge superstructure can continue to function normally after comprehensive structural repairs, the damage of the girder would be moderate.…”
Section: Damage Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 61% of interchange bridges have been damaged due to overheight collision forces in the United States and such systems include about 14% of whole bridge damages [12]. The mechanism and reasons for an over-height vehicle-bridge collision are complicated due to intricate dynamic effects, variability in forces, and different types of bridge structural and geometry [13]. The collision between an overheight truck and a prestressed concrete box girder bridge was studied based on the finite element-based software by Kong et al in 2020. In this article, the damage to the impacted girder and the collision force are analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig 13. The bridge deck lateral displacement subjected to the GT26 train load and over-height collision force in the middle of the railway bridge span for different collision loads due to the various collision speeds[20,25,26,28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional repair techniques involving posttensioning using external or near-surface mounted (NSM) steel and fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tendons involve the use of heavy hydraulic jacking equipment, and intricate anchorage systems, which lead to long construction times and, in case of bridges, high management of traffic costs. 1 In response to this issue, a rapid heat-induced posttensioning technique using unbonded NSM shape memory alloy (SMA) wires was proposed, and prototype reinforced concrete beams posttensioned with SMA wires were evaluated experimentally. 2 The suggested technique relies on the ability of SMA to recover seemingly plastic deformation upon heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%