2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 2015
DOI: 10.1109/smc.2015.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for the Coupling of Autonomous Control and Central Planning: Evaluation of Strategies Using Logistic Objectives Achievement and Planning Adherence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, compared to classical optimization approaches, the DLRP t offers extended degrees of freedom and variability, e.g., object individual decision functions (Rekersbrink and Wenning 2011). Schukraft et al (2015) applied different coupling strategies for the combined application of conventional planning and autonomous control methods in a shopfloor scenario similar to Scholz-Reiter et al (2010a). Depending on the extent of autonomous control for decision-making, these strategies can be rated from a low to a high level of autonomy.…”
Section: Autonomous Control and Conventional Planning And Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, compared to classical optimization approaches, the DLRP t offers extended degrees of freedom and variability, e.g., object individual decision functions (Rekersbrink and Wenning 2011). Schukraft et al (2015) applied different coupling strategies for the combined application of conventional planning and autonomous control methods in a shopfloor scenario similar to Scholz-Reiter et al (2010a). Depending on the extent of autonomous control for decision-making, these strategies can be rated from a low to a high level of autonomy.…”
Section: Autonomous Control and Conventional Planning And Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%