2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies for the production of high-content fructo-oligosaccharides through the removal of small saccharides by co-culture or successive fermentation with yeast

Abstract: Fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) obtained by fermentation of sucrose may be purified at large-scale by continuous chromatography (Simulated Moving Bed: SMB). In order to improve the efficiency of the subsequent SMB purification, the optimization of the fermentative broth composition in salts and sugars was investigated. Fermentations conducted at reduced amount of salts, using Aureobasidium pullulans whole cells, yielded 0.63 ± 0.03 g of FOS per gram of initial sucrose. Additionally, a microbial treatment was pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
61
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbial treatment is an increasingly attractive solution for the purification and enrichment of oligosaccharides from a crude preparation [23,32,35,[58][59][60]. Most previous studies involved sequential fermentation (or co-fermentation) with yeast such as S. cerevisae, K. lactis, and Pichia pastoris to remove the small sugars, increasing the purity and content of oligosaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microbial treatment is an increasingly attractive solution for the purification and enrichment of oligosaccharides from a crude preparation [23,32,35,[58][59][60]. Most previous studies involved sequential fermentation (or co-fermentation) with yeast such as S. cerevisae, K. lactis, and Pichia pastoris to remove the small sugars, increasing the purity and content of oligosaccharides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, glucose oxidase has been used to convert the glucose into gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide [31,32], whereas the use of glucose isomerase to convert glucose into fructose was not effective [33,34]. The microbial treatment of crude FOS preparations has also been considered, using species such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis, which prefer monosaccharides and disaccharides as carbon sources and convert them into ethanol and carbon dioxide, but the ethanol then needs to be removed [23,35]. It would be more efficient to convert the unwanted monosaccharides and disaccharides directly into valuable co-products using more suitable microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…biomass concentration (g X L −1 ) X min minimal biomass concentration (g X L −1 ) Y F/G biomass yield coefficient from fructose/glucose (g F/G .g − i constant penalty parameters final-time condition purification of FOS, industrially performed by simulated-movingbed chromatography [10]. Different strategies have been applied for the reduction of the glucose in the fermentation mixture [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of glucose, fructose, and sucrose decreases the prebiotic activity of the products. To obtain high content FOS, several techniques have been employed to remove the non-prebiotic sugars from the FOS mixtures, which include ultra and nanofiltration, activated charcoal systems, microbial treatment, and ion-exchange chromatography (Crittenden, & Playne, 2002;Nobre, 5 Suvarov, & De Weireld, 2014;Nobre, Teixeira, & Rodrigues, 2012;Nobre et al, 2016;Pinelo, Jonsson, & Meyer, 2009). The purity of FOS can reach up to 95% by using these purification techniques, but they are costly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glucose oxidase together with β-D-fructofuranosidase could improve FOS content up to 98%, but the sugar composition in the FOS was significantly different from that produced by fructosyltransferase/furanosidases (Yun, Lee, & Song, 1994). Nobre et al (2016) used a two-step fermentation to remove the non-prebiotic sugars and they obtained the FOS with a purity of 81.6%, in which FOS were synthesized by Aureobasidium pullulans and the small saccharides were metabolized by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Although these strategies significantly improved the purity of FOS, simple and low-cost processes for high-content FOS production remain to be established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%