This paper considers the relationship between policy and practice in the early years mathematics curriculum for reception-aged children (RC) of five years in England. It explores what the policy requires RC teachers to do in terms of curriculum implementation; what RC teachers' views and understanding of the early years mathematics curriculum are; how RC teachers implement early years mathematics policy; and how RC children respond. A case study design included interviews with élites who influenced the policy-making process, survey of RC teachers and a detailed investigation of three RC classes on three school sites. As élite interviews underlined, international comparison studies had had an important influence on early childhood mathematics policies by creating from late 1990s onwards, top-down pressure for standards. Élites and practitioners drew attention to a tension between a play-based pedagogy and a standards agenda. Tensions in policy text were reflected in mixed and ambivalent views and reported practices by élites and practitioners. RC teachers did not merely receive and implement policy expectations but brought their own values and understandings to practice. The study reveals an interplay between local and global influences in a context of changing views of early childhood, early learning and early childhood pedagogy.
Key words: early childhood; policy and practice; mathematics
IntroductionThis article was stimulated by a series of investigations of English children's early numeracy in the broader context of concern over low school mathematics achievement in England.Our European study of numeracy development of five-to six-year-olds revealed that performance differences between countries were negligible. This was surprising given that English children were in formal schooling throughout the three testing cycles, Belgian, German, Greek and Dutch children from the midpoint, and Slovene children not at all (van de Rijt et al. 2003). The English sample of 300 boys and girls were then tracked through primary school. Nothing much disturbed performance over children's primary years. Those making almost no progress by seven years, however, were distinguished less by low initial scores than by swift decline during the earliest years of schooling. Applying a discriminant analysis to the original assessment scores at age seven and eleven years revealed that general number knowledge or problemsolving had the most stable predictive value Aubrey, Godfrey and Dahl, 2006).More recently, a study of similarities and differences in young children's early numeracy age five years in England, Finland and the People's Republic of China (Aunio, Aubrey, Godfrey, Yuajuan and Liu, 2008) revealed that young Chinese children out-performed those from England and Finland and, in turn, Finnish children out-performed English children. Given the overall poor performance of English reception-class (RC) children (at five years) there was a stimulus to explore the policy context to changes in curriculum goals and pedagogical practices o...