2019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11040539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies to Improve Cancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy, Other Than Abscopal Effect: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Despite that the impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on malignancies treatment is unprecedented, a lack of response to these molecules is observed in several cases. Differently from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, where the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors results in a high efficacy, the response rate in other tumors, such as gastrointestinal cancers, breast cancer, sarcomas, and part of genitourinary cancers remains low. The first strategy evaluated to improve the response rate to immune checkp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent studies have also focused on the potential functions of some molecules, which can modify the immune microenvironment to up-regulate the proportion of immune-activated cells and down-regulate the immune-suppressive cells to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. The drugs include microbiota modifiers, drugs targeting co-inhibitory receptors, anti-angiogenic therapeutics, small molecules, and oncolytic viruses [ 113 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent studies have also focused on the potential functions of some molecules, which can modify the immune microenvironment to up-regulate the proportion of immune-activated cells and down-regulate the immune-suppressive cells to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. The drugs include microbiota modifiers, drugs targeting co-inhibitory receptors, anti-angiogenic therapeutics, small molecules, and oncolytic viruses [ 113 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that the impact of ICIs on malignancies treatment is unprecedented, unlike melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, the response rate in HCC remains low. in regards to this , as well as for other malignancies, researchers are evaluating combined approaches to increase the efficacy of ICIs [38].The combination of ICIs with anti-VEGF therapy is a major approach under investigation for HCC patients using the immunomodulatory effects of anti-VEGF drug as a means of decreasing CD4+ regulatory T-Lymphocytes and MDSCs as well as the activation and differentiation of dentric cells [39,40]. The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab resulted in 61% partial response among 21 HCC patients with a relatively positive tolerability characterized by 35% of the subjects experiencing grade III/IV adverse events [41].…”
Section: Combinatorial Approaches With Checkpoint Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now they are an established treatment for melanoma [ 7 , 8 ], NSCLC (non-small-cell lung carcinoma) [ 9 , 10 ], renal cell carcinoma [ 11 , 12 ], and are believed to be effective for some other cancer types [ 5 , 6 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Notably, it was observed that the efficacy of such therapy depends on the individual patient [ 13 , 17 , 18 ], which makes it necessary to investigate biomarkers of improved response. It is currently believed that a better response to ICIs is associated with PD-L1 expression, the number of tumor infiltrated lymphocytes, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is currently believed that a better response to ICIs is associated with PD-L1 expression, the number of tumor infiltrated lymphocytes, etc. [ 13 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. It was also noticed that the efficacy of treatment with ICIs correlates with the tumor mutation burden (TMB) [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation