Strategies to increase agricultural productivity and reduce land degradation: evidence from Uganda

Abstract

This paper estimates a structural econometric model of household decisions regarding income strategies, participation in programs and organisations, crop choices, land management, and labour use, and their implications for agricultural production and soil erosion; based upon a survey of over 450 households and their farm plots in Uganda. Many factors have context-specific impacts and involve trade-offs between increasing production and reducing land degradation. Government agricultural extension and training programs contribute to higher value of crop production in the lowlands, but to soil erosion in the highlands. By contrast, non-governmental organization (NGO) programs focusing on agriculture and environment help to reduce erosion, but have less favourable impacts on production in the lowlands. Education increases household incomes, but also reduces crop production in the lowlands. Poverty has mixed impacts on agricultural production, depending on the nature of poverty: smaller farms obtain higher crop production per hectare, while households with fewer livestock have lower crop production. Population pressure contributes to agricultural intensification, but also to erosion in the densely populated highlands. Several household income strategies contribute to increased value of crop production, without significant impacts on soil erosion. We find little evidence of impact of access to markets, roads and credit, land tenure or title on agricultural intensification and crop production and land degradation. In general, the results imply that the strategies to increase agricultural production and reduce land degradation must be location-specific, and that there are few 'win-win' opportunities to simultaneously increase production and reduce land degradation. 0 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: QO I ; Q24; Q 12; Q 18

Household Livelihood Strategies and Implication for Poverty Reduction in Rural Areas of Central Nepal

“…It could be due to their study site being closer to the market center than ours since proximity to the market and road enables farmers to sell products with a greater farm gate price [69,70]. Aligned with the previous findings [6,71,72], our results also indicate a greater probability of adopting market-oriented higher returning LSs by the households that are located closer to the road and market. Financial capital is pivotal for the rural poor to start up any commercially-oriented business/enterprises [10].…”

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Soil Erosion Control Technologies by Farmers along the Slopes of Mt. Elgon in Eastern Uganda

“…However, in most SSA countries, agricultural productivity and production growth are low mainly because land in many areas is degraded (Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa [ASARECA], 2004;Zimmermann et al, 2009). Land degradation is most problematic in highlands and it impairs the capacity of soils to support proper plant growth (Sanchez, 2002;Hellin, 2003;Pender et al, 2004;Sachs et al, 2004). It is estimated that 95 million hectares of land in eastern and central Africa have reached a state of degradation where only huge investments can make them productive again (Henao & Baanante, 2006).…”

Do Farmers’ Asset Values Correlate with Land Quality?

“…Hence, most analytical studies on natural resource degradation follow integrated statistical approaches where information collected on natural environmental factors and socio-economic conditions of custodians are used to identify the significance of causal relationships or associative patterns that can explain the state of land quality (e.g. Pender, Nkonya, Jagger, Sserunkuuma, & Ssali, 2004;Firew, 2014). This paper follows the latter approach and seeks the possibility to relate asset values derived from the sustainable livelihood approach (Chambers and Conway, 1992;Scoones, 1998) to the hazard of natural resource degradation.…”