Strategies to Prevent Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in Acute Care Hospitals

Abstract

Previously published guidelines are available that provide comprehensive recommendations for detecting and preventing healthcare-associated infections. The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention efforts. Refer to the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America/Infectious Diseases Society of America “Compendium of Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections” Executive Summary and Introduction and accompanying editorial for additional discussion.1. Patients at risk for CLABSIs in acute care facilitiesa. Intensive care unit (ICU) population: The risk of CLABSI in ICU patients is high. Reasons for this include the frequent insertion of multiple catheters, the use of specific types of catheters that are almost exclusively inserted in ICU patients and associated with substantial risk (eg, arterial catheters), and the fact that catheters are frequently placed in emergency circumstances, repeatedly accessed each day, and often needed for extended periods.b. Non-ICU population: Although the primary focus of attention over the past 2 decades has been the ICU setting, recent data suggest that the greatest numbers of patients with central lines are in hospital units outside the ICU, where there is a substantial risk of CLABSI.2. Outcomes associated with hospital-acquired CLABSIa. Increased length of hospital stayb. Increased cost; the non-inflation-adjusted attributable cost of CLABSIs has been found to vary from $3,700 to $29,000 per episode

The Impact of a Medical Procedure Service on Patient Safety, Procedure Quality and Resident Training Opportunities

“…Best practice safety process measures were defined as those processes recommended by guidelines and implemented to increase safety: use of ultrasound guidance during internal jugular or femoral CVC and thoracentesis; selection of preferred CVC site (subclavian or internal jugular vein as opposed to femoral vein); and attending-level participation (either as supervisor or primary operator). 11,13,14 …”

Recommendations for the Use of Intraosseous Vascular Access for Emergent and Nonemergent Situations in Various Health Care Settings: A Consensus Paper

“…Central catheters are associated with infection and increased length of hospital stays. 43 Hospital-acquired infections have been placed on a list of "never events" by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), and both CMS and large private insurers will not fully reimburse hospitals for catheter-related infections. 44 When economic factors are being weighed, the potential complications of therapeutic strategies should be considered.…”

Adherencia médica a las indicaciones de procedimientos invasores en la unidad de pacientes críticos de un hospital universitario

“…• Evaluar la adherencia de los médicos residentes de UPC a los criterios de indicación de dos procedimientos invasores, como son la instalación de un acceso venoso central (CVC) y de un catéter urinario a permanencia (CUP), cuyo objetivo es prevenir la infección del torrente sanguíneo asociado a CVC (ITS-CVC) 4 , e infección urinaria asociada a catéter urinario a permanencia (ITU-CUP) 5 .…”