2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12230-010-9131-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies to Reduce Nitrate Leaching into Groundwater in Potato Grown in Sandy Soils: Case Study from North Central USA

Abstract: There is increasing public concern to reduce nitrate pollution to groundwater, especially in sandy soils. Strategies to reduce nitrate leaching are developed to increase N use efficiency, reduce groundwater pollution, and increase tuber yield. A growing interest in N management should consider management strategies for N supply, soil moisture for transport, and crop N demand that are economical and compatible with local production systems. We present a review of the literature on conventional and innovative st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies on this subject observed flow‐weighted mean nitrate N concentrations >40 mg N L −1 and nitrate N losses during the growing season of >200 kg N ha −1 , compared with losses of 20 kg N ha −1 from the control treatment (Errebhi et al., 1998; Saffigna et al., 1977). These early studies used an N fertilizer source (e.g., ammonium nitrate) and application timing (e.g., most N applied at planting) that were extremely prone to nitrate leaching losses (Shrestha et al., 2010). In contrast, the current source and timing BMPs evaluated in the present and other recent studies have reported nitrate N leaching losses of comparable magnitude to that of control treatments in the early studies, demonstrating that considerable progress has been made in reducing nitrate N leaching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies on this subject observed flow‐weighted mean nitrate N concentrations >40 mg N L −1 and nitrate N losses during the growing season of >200 kg N ha −1 , compared with losses of 20 kg N ha −1 from the control treatment (Errebhi et al., 1998; Saffigna et al., 1977). These early studies used an N fertilizer source (e.g., ammonium nitrate) and application timing (e.g., most N applied at planting) that were extremely prone to nitrate leaching losses (Shrestha et al., 2010). In contrast, the current source and timing BMPs evaluated in the present and other recent studies have reported nitrate N leaching losses of comparable magnitude to that of control treatments in the early studies, demonstrating that considerable progress has been made in reducing nitrate N leaching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in 2011, more N was lost from potato fields than sweet corn and silage corn compared to year 2012 (Fig 3A). The shallow root system of potato is often considered as one of the major cause for poor N use efficiency by the potato crop alongwith with poor water and nutrient holding capacity of sandy soils [40]. Errebhi et al [37]) reported linear increases in N losses with proportionate increase in N supply from potato fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination of groundwater with nitrate is a global problem (Spalding and Exner, 1993;McLay et al, 2001;Oenema et al, 2009) and threatens the quality of groundwater as a resource for drinking water in especially North America and the European Union (De Clerq et al, 2001;Shrestha et al, 2010;Chaudhuri et al, 2010). This contamination is commonly associated with diffuse sources such as intensive agriculture, high density of houses with unsewered sanitation, and point sources such as irrigation using sewage effluent onto land (Keeney, 1986;Wakida and Lerner, 2005;Ledoux, et al, 2007;Almasri and Kaluarachchi, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%