2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategies to reduce the caesarean section rate in a private hospital and their impact

Abstract: There is a concern around the world of an increasing caesarean section rate. It was estimated that between 2010 and 2015, caesarean section rates increased by almost 50%. There are several implications for this, considering that caesarean sections are associated with higher costs and worse clinical outcomes. In this context, several interventions have been considered to increase vaginal delivery rates, including the Adequate Childbirth Project (PPA) in Brazil. This study aimed to verify the impact of the strat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are surprising and inconsistent with many other BSS‐R validation studies, for example, Jefford et al, 3 Romero‐Gonzalez et al, 5 Nespoli et al, 6 Emmens et al, 28 Skvirsky et al 29 which invariably show that women who had an intervention delivery (i.e., caesarean section) have significantly lower BSS‐R scores compared with vaginal delivery. Since the dominant agenda within maternity care is to reduce the cesarean section rate, 31 findings from the current investigation are at odds with established evidence regarding BSS‐R scores in study and policy itself. It is possible that these findings may again relate to the dynamics of the public healthcare system in India, which primarily focus upon medical aspects of care and safe, efficient, and clinical removal of the fetus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These findings are surprising and inconsistent with many other BSS‐R validation studies, for example, Jefford et al, 3 Romero‐Gonzalez et al, 5 Nespoli et al, 6 Emmens et al, 28 Skvirsky et al 29 which invariably show that women who had an intervention delivery (i.e., caesarean section) have significantly lower BSS‐R scores compared with vaginal delivery. Since the dominant agenda within maternity care is to reduce the cesarean section rate, 31 findings from the current investigation are at odds with established evidence regarding BSS‐R scores in study and policy itself. It is possible that these findings may again relate to the dynamics of the public healthcare system in India, which primarily focus upon medical aspects of care and safe, efficient, and clinical removal of the fetus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In a randomised controlled trial, local opinion leader education was an effective method of encouraging a trial of labour and vaginal birth for women with previous caesarean deliveries 20. Since 2014, our hospital has carried out a programme called Adequate Childbirth, which with a multicomponent approach (creation and training of a multidisciplinary team, education of pregnant women, improvements in infrastructure and audits of delivery types) achieved an increase in the vaginal delivery rate of 27.5% and reduced neonatal intensive care unit admissions by 31.2% 21…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Since 2014, our hospital has carried out a programme called Adequate Childbirth, which with a multicomponent approach (creation and training of a multidisciplinary team, education of pregnant women, improvements in infrastructure and audits of delivery types) achieved an increase in the vaginal delivery rate of 27.5% and reduced neonatal intensive care unit admissions by 31.2%. 21 The US healthcare system wastes $760 billion to $935 billion annually, representing 25% of total healthcare costs. 22 In 2012, the American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation started a campaign called 'Choosing Wisely', which aimed to reduce low-value care services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons why multidisciplinary collaboration reduced CS is more related to the general atmosphere and ethos which were built when it was leveraged: strong teamwork where every member in the team has greater awareness on what their roles are, work collaboratively in resolving issues, and communicate with each other respectfully. For example, a recent study in Brazil reported that implementing multidisciplinary collaboration among providers, along with engagement with pregnant women and improvements to hospital facilities reduced CS and increased vaginal birth [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, interventions targeting healthcare providers to change their behaviours around CS have been tested. A Cochrane intervention review identified 16 intervention studies targeting healthcare providers and systems, typically focusing on implementation of audit and feedback of CS data combined with either implementation of clinical guidelines and protocols, mandatory secondary opinion for CS decision-making, or working with local opinion leaders to influence change [19][20][21]. Audit and feedback can help healthcare providers to assess the distribution of CS across different groups of women, and identify areas for appropriate increases or decreases in these groups based on obstetric characteristics [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%