Strategies Used by Community-Based Organizations to Evaluate Their Locally Developed HIV Prevention Interventions: Lessons Learned from the CDC's Innovative Interventions Project

Abstract

Community-based organizations (CBOs) play an important role in health promotion efforts and the delivery of HIV prevention interventions for at-risk minority populations. CBOs may also develop their own interventions but often lack the capacity or funds to rigorously evaluate them. The Innovative Interventions project of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded three CBOs to rigorously evaluate the efficacy of interventions they had developed and were delivering to Black women, Black men who have sex with men (MSM), and adolescent males in juvenile justice settings, respectively. The evaluation results have been reported elsewhere. This article describes operational issues that the CBOs identified as being particularly salient to their evaluations and the strategies they developed to address the issues and successfully complete their evaluations. These issues included the development of organizational capacity to conduct a rigorous outcome evaluation, difficulties with recruitment and retention of evaluation participants, and the use of process monitoring data to improve intervention delivery. The strategies described in this article can be used by CBOs when evaluating their locally developed HIV prevention interventions and may be of interest to funding agencies and researchers that collaborate with CBOs to evaluate their interventions.

HIV in Indian MSM: Reasons for a concentrated epidemic & strategies for prevention

“…Since the beginning of the HIV/AIDS epidemic HIV prevention interventions have been conducted in the absence of evidence-based research. CBOs need support to evaluate interventions within at risk communities, demonstrate efficacy, and improve effectiveness research68.…”

SiHLEWeb.com: Development and usability testing of an evidence-based HIV prevention website for female African-American adolescents

“…As of 2011, 74 HIV/STI risk reduction and prevention interventions had been developed and identified as evidence-based by the Centers for Disease Control in the United States; nearly a third of these interventions have culturally-tailored elements intended to increase engagement among minority/African-American populations (8). However, many of these interventions require significant resources, including financial, personnel, and time to implement, and may not be readily available or accessible to populations at highest risk (9, 10). Impediments to the effective dissemination through traditional means include, but are not limited to, lack of service providers (particularly in more rural areas), high staff turnover, lack of transportation to services, potential stigmatization, and other client characteristics such as substance use (11)…”

Enhancement of a Locally Developed HIV Prevention Intervention for Hispanic/Latino MSM: A Partnership of Community-Based Organizations, a University, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

“…The PALMS intervention was classified by CDC as a “good evidence” intervention and added to the Compendium. The CDC Innovative Interventions project demonstrated that CBOs could develop and deliver effective HIV prevention interventions for at-risk minority populations and, with support from CDC and researcher partners, rigorously evaluate their locally-developed interventions (Painter, Ngalame, Lucas, Lauby, & Herbst, 2010). …”