2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy and Efficacy of Generic and Pan-genotypic Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir in Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Myanmar Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Similarly, sofosbuvir-daclatasvir pan-genotypic regimen resulted in 96.9% and 93.3% SVR for genotypes 3 and 6, respectively. 32 Thus, the high prevalence of HCV genotype 6 and to a lesser extent genotypes 3 and 1 from this study suggest that treatment with a pan-genotypic DAAs regimen is most appropriate and is expected to be highly safe and effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…31 Similarly, sofosbuvir-daclatasvir pan-genotypic regimen resulted in 96.9% and 93.3% SVR for genotypes 3 and 6, respectively. 32 Thus, the high prevalence of HCV genotype 6 and to a lesser extent genotypes 3 and 1 from this study suggest that treatment with a pan-genotypic DAAs regimen is most appropriate and is expected to be highly safe and effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Generic drugs and their combinations produced by companies under the license of the Medicines Patent Pool and prequalified by WHO and/or other regulatory authorities have been shown to generate similar results to the original compounds, with similar safety and tolerability. [157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167] The panel recognises the heterogeneity of per capita incomes and health insurance systems across Europe and in other regions, and therefore the constraints that may necessitate continued utilisation of regimens described in previous versions of these recommendations but no longer recommended. In settings where none of the IFN-free, ribavirin-free options proposed in this document are available, options proposed in previous versions of these recommendations remain acceptable for patients likely to respond to these regimens until new DAAs become available and affordable; see prior EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C. 120,[168][169][170][171] In particular, in many lowand middle-income countries where the pangenotypic DAA combinations recommended in the present document are not available and/or not affordable, the combination of generic sofosbuvir and daclatasvir is safe and well tolerated and provides high SVR rates at a very low price.…”
Section: Treatment Of Chronic Hepatitis C In Patients Without Cirrhosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 , 18 , 19 Recent studies on the treatment effectiveness of DAA‐based regimens in HCV infected patients in Myanmar have shown mixed SVR12 achievements ranging from 77% to 98.6%. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 Most of them studied on general populations 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 with only one study having more than half of their study patients as HIV/HCV co‐infected patients 25 making our study a valuable addition to the existing evidence of the real‐world effectiveness of DAA‐based regimens among HIV/HCV co‐infected patients in Myanmar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%