1997
DOI: 10.1080/08838159709364404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy and style in attention to television

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the television, 46.2 percent of gazes were <1.5 seconds, with 75.8 percent of gazes lasting <5 seconds and 86 percent lasting <10 seconds. These numbers match quite closely with the short gaze benchmarks established for television content in Hawkins et al 10,11 Although gazes on the computer were also heavily biased toward shorter looks, their distribution was more dispersed: 22.6 percent of computer gazes were <1.5 seconds, 49 percent were <5 seconds, and 64.5 percent were <10 seconds. Compared to television, computer attention also had a larger portion of extended gazes: 7.4 percent of gazes to the computer lasted longer than 60 seconds, whereas only 2.9 percent of television gazes broke the 1-minute barrier.…”
Section: Does Visual Attention Differ For the Computer Versus The Telsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the television, 46.2 percent of gazes were <1.5 seconds, with 75.8 percent of gazes lasting <5 seconds and 86 percent lasting <10 seconds. These numbers match quite closely with the short gaze benchmarks established for television content in Hawkins et al 10,11 Although gazes on the computer were also heavily biased toward shorter looks, their distribution was more dispersed: 22.6 percent of computer gazes were <1.5 seconds, 49 percent were <5 seconds, and 64.5 percent were <10 seconds. Compared to television, computer attention also had a larger portion of extended gazes: 7.4 percent of gazes to the computer lasted longer than 60 seconds, whereas only 2.9 percent of television gazes broke the 1-minute barrier.…”
Section: Does Visual Attention Differ For the Computer Versus The Telsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In a study of gaze duration during television viewing, Hawkins et al 10 showed a strong peak of gazes lasting around 1.5 seconds, with a median gaze duration of under 2 seconds. This would place the majority of gazes into their monitoring (defined as quick glances of 1.5 seconds or less, to confirm prior schematic expectations) and orienting (defined as establishing gazes of 1.5 to 5 seconds, to identify characters and action) categories, both of which feature little active cognition, conscious insight, or depth of processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most fell between 1 and 5 seconds. The gaze episodes on the TV are dramatically shorter than Hawkins et al [1997] found in 1997. In their findings, the average look at television is about 7 seconds with a median length of just under 2 seconds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Furthermore, viewers quickly adopted coping strategies to direct their attention among the many pictures. Hawkins et al [1997] found the average look at television is about 7 seconds, with the median length of a gaze less than 2 seconds. They argue that very short looks (less than 1.5 seconds) probably reflect an active, informed monitoring of content and that while these looks may be too brief to capture much information, the "checking in" is useful to someone familiar with the plot.…”
Section: Television Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, Hawkins, Pingree, Bruce, and Tapper (1997) proposed a model of attention to media messages, specifically television, according to how long people gaze at it, that is, a single continuum that varied by number of seconds people attend to a message on the TV screen. They then divided the distribution of seconds into Downloaded by [George Mason University] at 02:13 14 June 2016 POTTER neighborhoods, each with its own name: monitoring, orienting, engaged, and staring.…”
Section: Delineating Exposure and Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%