“…Characterized by some as part of human geography's cultural, institutional, or relational "turns" (Crang, 1997;Amin and Thrift, 2000;Amin, 2001;Bathelt and Glückler, 2003;Yeung, 2005a), scholars with a wide range of empirical and theoretical interests have considered or studied how socio-spatial practices influence a diverse range of phenomena and processes: learning and innovation (Gertler, 2003;Amin and Cohendet, 2004;Faulconbridge, 2006;Hall, 2008;, industrial organization (Bathelt et al, 2004;Glückler, 2005;James, 2007;Jones, 2007;Palmer and O'Kane, 2007;Pain, 2008), market systems (Crewe et al, 2003;Gibson-Graham, 2008;Berndt and Boeckler, 2009), networks and globalization (Amin, 2002;Hess, 2004;Murphy, 2006a), livelihood strategies (Smith and Stenning, 2006;Stenning et al, 2010), development (Radcliffe and Laurie, 2006;Abbott et al, 2007), race, class, and gender relations (Cameron and Gibson-Graham, 2003;Slocum, 2007;Dowling, 2009), neoliberal governance (Larner, 2005;Larner and Laurie, 2009;Dowling, 2010), and consumption and householding (Barr and Gilg, 2006;Mansvelt, 2009). A common link between these literatures is an explicit interest in what can be broadly defined as 'socioeconomic practices': the stabilized, routinized, or improvised social actions that constitute and reproduce economic space, and through and within which diverse actors (e.g., entrepreneurs, workers, caregivers, consumers, firms) and communities (e.g., industries, places, markets, cultural groups) organize materials, produce, consume, and/or derive meaning from the economic world.…”