2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-3796(02)00167-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy for the blanket testing in ITER

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the ITER classifications of load specification, the assumptions for plasma disruption are 40 ms for current decay time and 18 ms for exponential decay [6,7]. During plasma disruption mechanical forces and stresses can be produced due to the interaction between the eddy currents induced in TBM and the magnetic fields.…”
Section: Em Stress Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the ITER classifications of load specification, the assumptions for plasma disruption are 40 ms for current decay time and 18 ms for exponential decay [6,7]. During plasma disruption mechanical forces and stresses can be produced due to the interaction between the eddy currents induced in TBM and the magnetic fields.…”
Section: Em Stress Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of DEMO relevancy and how to achieve it in the TBM testing programme has extensively been discussed in [3,4]. Methods to quantify the DEMO relevancy of the TBM design have been proposed in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is helium cooled pebble bed (HCPB) [5] originally developed by Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in Germany and one is helium cooled lithium lead (HCLL) [6] originally developed by CEA in France. HCPB TBM is a ceramic breeder concept that contains lithium ceramic breeder and beryllium in the box as a breeder material and tritium extraction from the system is solved by low-pressure helium stream.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%