2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategy Shift Toward Lower Spatial Frequencies in the Recognition of Dynamic Facial Expressions of Basic Emotions: When It Moves It Is Different

Abstract: Facial expressions of emotion play a key role in social interactions. While in everyday life, their dynamic and transient nature calls for a fast processing of the visual information they contain, a majority of studies investigating the visual processes underlying their recognition have focused on their static display. The present study aimed to gain a better understanding of these processes while using more ecological dynamic facial expressions. In two experiments, we directly compared the spatial frequency (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the broad literature supporting the advantage of dynamic facial expression over static ones (e.g. [50,51]) and the shift toward lower SFs in their processing, it would be interesting to replicate these ndings using dynamic pain facial expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Considering the broad literature supporting the advantage of dynamic facial expression over static ones (e.g. [50,51]) and the shift toward lower SFs in their processing, it would be interesting to replicate these ndings using dynamic pain facial expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hence, a more ecological way of investigating pain facial expression recognition would be to use dynamic stimuli. Interestingly, it has been shown that a slight shift toward lower SFs occurs for dynamic expressions (i.e anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise) in comparison with static ones [50]. These authors suggest that it is the presence of motion in general that causes this shift in SFs and not motion information per se, since a shift to LSFs is also observed when frames of dynamic facial expressions are shu ed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, it has been shown that a slight shift toward lower SFs occurs for dynamic expressions (i.e. anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise) in comparison with static ones 57 . These authors suggest that it is the presence of motion in general that causes this shift in SFs and not motion information per se , since a shift to LSFs is also observed when frames of dynamic facial expressions are shuffled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, no prior studies used EEG to study the oscillatory basis of dynamic FE processing. Two behavioral studies compared dynamic FEs to static FEs [ 30 , 31 ], revealing stronger perception and emotional responses to dynamic FEs as compared to static FEs. And there were several studies investigating dynamic FEs with EEG, but focusing on event-related potentials [ 32 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%