2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2023.103855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strategyproof Mechanism for Two-Sided Matching with Resource Allocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, diversity constraints ensure a balanced mix of different student types within a school [8][9][10][11][12]. This topic has been receiving increased attention from AI researchers [13][14][15][16][17]. Throughout this paper, we focus on the context of a school-student allocation problem to enhance reader comprehension, although the results are applicable to general allocation problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, diversity constraints ensure a balanced mix of different student types within a school [8][9][10][11][12]. This topic has been receiving increased attention from AI researchers [13][14][15][16][17]. Throughout this paper, we focus on the context of a school-student allocation problem to enhance reader comprehension, although the results are applicable to general allocation problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li Yingxin et al [10] studied the matching of design tasks and knowledge resources, established a matching framework for cloud manufacturing patterns, and validated the quality of this method using product development process knowledge as an example. Liu et al [11] considered the resource matching problem between students and projects, classified them into different types based on their preferences, and developed a strategy proof mechanism to meet the requirements of fairness and efficiency. However, there are few existing studies on human job bilateral matching, and most of them are based on basic calculations, and the impact of matching results on individual matching satisfaction is rarely considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%