1985
DOI: 10.2172/5630749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphic and structural data for the Conasauga Group and the Rome Formation on the Copper Creek fault block near Oak Ridge, Tennessee: preliminary results from test borehole ORNL-JOY No. 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.2.1 Physiography -.... Specifically, the Conasauga Group in the Copper Creek thrust sheet was described The ORR is located in the western portion in detail and the group was subdivided of the Valley and Ridge physiographic into formations (Haase et al 1985); addi-province in eastern Tennessee. The physitional subdivision and descriptions were ographic province extends from the St. made of parts of the Knox Group (Lee and Lawrence lowlands to Alabama and varies Ketelle 1987) and the Chickamauga Group in width from 20 to 120 km (Fenneman (Lee and Ketelle 1988).…”
Section: Debuchananne and R M Richardson Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1.2.1 Physiography -.... Specifically, the Conasauga Group in the Copper Creek thrust sheet was described The ORR is located in the western portion in detail and the group was subdivided of the Valley and Ridge physiographic into formations (Haase et al 1985); addi-province in eastern Tennessee. The physitional subdivision and descriptions were ographic province extends from the St. made of parts of the Knox Group (Lee and Lawrence lowlands to Alabama and varies Ketelle 1987) and the Chickamauga Group in width from 20 to 120 km (Fenneman (Lee and Ketelle 1988).…”
Section: Debuchananne and R M Richardson Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4. sheet, however, the Rome can be as much as 450 m thick (Plate 1). In the Copper Creek thrust sheet, Haase et al (1985) 3.2 ROME FORMATION reported a thickness of 188 m using the JOY-2 core, and McReynolds (1988) re-Peter J. Lemiszki ORR, McMaster (1962) recognized the is recognized by narrow, steep ridges existence of complex lithologic and strucbroken by closely spaced wind and water tural relationships in the Rome Formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The change in gradient occurs below a gouge-rich fault zone with very low permeability and also is nearly coincident with the contact between the upper and lower Pumpkin Valley Formation. The lower Pumpkin Valley Formation is more silt-rich than the upper member and has much more massive beds because of pervasive bioturbation (Haase et al 1985). Both geologic features may influence the lc_:ation of the gradient change; however, at present, the relative importance of these features has not been determined or modeled.…”
Section: Pressure Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strata of greatest interest, with respect to contaminant migration in BCV groundwater, include the Maynardville and Nolichucky Formations of the Conasauga Group. For general descriptions of the stratigraphy of other traitsin the ORR, the reader is referred to Haase, Walls, and Farmer (1985) (Conasauga Group and Rome Formation), Lee and Ketelle (1987)…”
Section: Stratigraphymentioning
confidence: 99%