Special Paper 439: Late Cenozoic Drainage History of the Southwestern Great Basin and Lower Colorado River Region: Geologic And 2008
DOI: 10.1130/2008.2439(15)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphic evidence for the role of lake spillover in the inception of the lower Colorado River in southern Nevada and western Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
110
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bouse Formation was defi ned in the Blythe basin and its geographic extent has since been expanded to include the MohaveCottonwood, Chemehuevi, and Bristol basins along and near the lower Colorado River corridor in Arizona, California, and Nevada (Metzger, 1968;Olmsted, 1972;Mattick et al, 1973;Olmsted et al, 1973;Carr and Dickey, 1980;Buising, 1988;Turak, 2000;House et al, 2008). Except for a disputed outcrop near the Laguna Diversion and Imperial Dams (sample locality J219 of Winterer, 1975; see also Olmsted et al, 1973, fi g. 15 therein), the Bouse Formation is identifi ed only in the subsurface in the Yuma area of Arizona McDougall , 2008a;Spencer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bouse Formation was defi ned in the Blythe basin and its geographic extent has since been expanded to include the MohaveCottonwood, Chemehuevi, and Bristol basins along and near the lower Colorado River corridor in Arizona, California, and Nevada (Metzger, 1968;Olmsted, 1972;Mattick et al, 1973;Olmsted et al, 1973;Carr and Dickey, 1980;Buising, 1988;Turak, 2000;House et al, 2008). Except for a disputed outcrop near the Laguna Diversion and Imperial Dams (sample locality J219 of Winterer, 1975; see also Olmsted et al, 1973, fi g. 15 therein), the Bouse Formation is identifi ed only in the subsurface in the Yuma area of Arizona McDougall , 2008a;Spencer et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) provide a rich source of information about the paleohydrology of spring, lake, and river waters in this region over the past 12 Ma. Recent models for the Bouse Formation have inferred a series of events that took place during a short period of time (bracketed between 5.6 and 4.8 Ma), when first-arriving Colorado River water caused a chain of lakes and internally drained basins to progressively fill and spill in a downward-propagating sequence (Blackwelder, 1934;Spencer and Patchett, 1997;House et al, 2005House et al, , 2008House and Pearthree, 2014;Roskowski et al, 2010;Spencer et al, 2008Spencer et al, , 2013. The Bouse Formation provides a record of these events, which some studies conclude took place in less than 50-100 ka (Spencer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20B; e.g., Spencer and Patchett, 1997). The inland-lake hypothesis has gained support fromstudies of carbonate geochemistry, Sr isotopes, C and O isotopes, stratigraphy, and hydrologicmodels (e.g., Poulson and John, 2003;House et al, 2008;Roskowski et al, 2010;Spencer et al, 2008Spencer et al, , 2013Pearthree and House, 2014;Bright et al, 2016).We suggest that some of these datasets should be reevaluated in light of new constraints presented in this paper. The marine-embayment hypothesis (this study) is supported by multiple lines of evidence including micro-and macro-paleontology, Sr, O, and C isotopes, chemical mixing models, process sedimentology, and Fourier transform analysis of tidal rhythmites (Table 3).…”
Section: Depositional Paleoenvironments Of the Southern Bouse Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally agreed that the northern Bouse Formation (Fig. 1) accumulated in a series of lakes that filled with water and sediment of the first-arriving Colorado River (Spencer and Patchett, 1997;House et al, 2008;Roskowski et al, The Bouse Formation has previously been subdivided into a basal carbonate unit, an interbedded unit of mudstone, sandstone, and siltstone, and an age-equivalent basin-margin association of tufa and conglomerate (Metzger, 1968;Buising, 1988Buising, , 1990.We refine this nomenclature and divide the southern Bouse into three informal members ( Fig. 3A): (1) basal carbonate consisting of travertine, bioclastic facies, and fine-grained marl (lime mudstone); (2) siliciclastic member which includes green claystone, red mudstone and siltstone, and Colorado River cross-bedded sandstone; and (3) upper bioclastic member.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%