2021
DOI: 10.1111/bre.12589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphic response to fragmentation of the Miocene Andean foreland basin, NW Argentina

Abstract: Foreland basins are sensitive recorders of spatiotemporal variations in tectonic and climatic forcing associated with an approaching orogenic front. Thus, analysis of foreland deposits and their associated deformation patterns and provenance signals allows assessment of tectonic and sedimentary processes during orogeny, providing clues to past environmental conditions. The Calchaquí region in the southern part of the northwest Argentinian Eastern Cordillera (ca. 25-26°S lat) structurally evolved from a contigu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(240 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Onset of deformation and uplift of the Candelaria Range is well constrained by growth strata in the lower Jujuy Subgroup (∼9 Ma) flanking this range (Figure 5); this suggests a nearly simultaneous propagation of deformation at this latitude of the El Brete Range, which we infer to have started at ∼10 Ma, similar to the Metán Range (Hain et al, 2011). This appears to be a regional phenomenon, as mountain ranges in the northern Sierras Pampeanas and the southern Eastern Cordillera exhibit a similar timing of late Cenozoic uplift and deformation (Figures 6b, 7a, and 7b;Carrapa et al, 2011;Deeken et al, 2006;del Papa et al, 2021;Garcia et al, 2013;Hain et al, 2011;Löbens et al, 2013a;Mortimer et al, 2007;Payrola et al, 2020;Pearson et al, 2013;Pingel, Deeken, et al, 2023;Sobel & Strecker, 2003;Zapata et al, 2020). Subsequently, activity continued with slip along the Las Animas (1) and Las Iglesia (2) faults, followed by a major pulse of uplift associated with the El Brete Fault (3) (Figure 6b).…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Style Of Deformationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Onset of deformation and uplift of the Candelaria Range is well constrained by growth strata in the lower Jujuy Subgroup (∼9 Ma) flanking this range (Figure 5); this suggests a nearly simultaneous propagation of deformation at this latitude of the El Brete Range, which we infer to have started at ∼10 Ma, similar to the Metán Range (Hain et al, 2011). This appears to be a regional phenomenon, as mountain ranges in the northern Sierras Pampeanas and the southern Eastern Cordillera exhibit a similar timing of late Cenozoic uplift and deformation (Figures 6b, 7a, and 7b;Carrapa et al, 2011;Deeken et al, 2006;del Papa et al, 2021;Garcia et al, 2013;Hain et al, 2011;Löbens et al, 2013a;Mortimer et al, 2007;Payrola et al, 2020;Pearson et al, 2013;Pingel, Deeken, et al, 2023;Sobel & Strecker, 2003;Zapata et al, 2020). Subsequently, activity continued with slip along the Las Animas (1) and Las Iglesia (2) faults, followed by a major pulse of uplift associated with the El Brete Fault (3) (Figure 6b).…”
Section: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Style Of Deformationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To the north, thermochronologic data from the Sierra de Cachi‐Palermo and growth strata at Lampasillos‐Aguada suggest these ranges were topographic highs by the mid‐late Miocene (Pearson et al., 2012; Vezzoli et al., 2012). Sediments derived from the Sierra de Metán, Sierra Ovejeria, and Sierra León Muerto and AHe data from the Sierra Mojotoro suggest active uplift by ∼10 Ma (Figure 7b; Del Papa et al., 2021; Galli et al., 2014; Hain et al., 2011; Pearson et al., 2013). Exhumation likely began at the eastern flank of Sierra Aconquija at ∼9 Ma and saline lakes to the east suggest the range had sufficient topography to disrupt E‐directed drainage from the proto‐El Cajón‐Santa María basin to Tucumán (Löbens et al., 2013; Zapata, Sobel, del Papa, Muruaga, & Zhou, 2019).…”
Section: Basin Evolution and Paleo‐drainage Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including the studies listed above, many researchers have documented Eocene deformation throughout north-western Argentina and northern Chile with an area extending from approximately 22° to 27°S and from 69° to 65°W (Figure 8a, e.g., del Papa et al, 2013;Henríquez et al, 2020Henríquez et al, , 2022Montero-López et al, 2021;Payrola et al, 2020). A more comprehensive list of references used to determine the onset of deformation on a more regional scale (incl., Aramayo et al, 2017;del Papa et al, 2021;Hongn et al, 2011;Montero-López et al, 2017;Reiners et al, 2015;Reynolds et al, 2000;Vezzoli et al, 2012) is provided in Table S6 in Supporting Information S2 and a graphical representation of the data is shown in Figures 8 and 9.…”
Section: Regional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%