2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphy and soil properties of fens: Geophysical case studies from northeastern Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These laboratory tests have not been explicitly confirmed by the field surveys presented in this paper. This results probably from the spatial variability of the peatland and influence of individual factors (such as moisture content, ash The ERI method may be useful for determining the stratigraphic contact between the peat layer and the mineral substrate (Slater and Reeve 2002;Comas et al 2015;Walter et al 2016), which is also confirmed by this report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These laboratory tests have not been explicitly confirmed by the field surveys presented in this paper. This results probably from the spatial variability of the peatland and influence of individual factors (such as moisture content, ash The ERI method may be useful for determining the stratigraphic contact between the peat layer and the mineral substrate (Slater and Reeve 2002;Comas et al 2015;Walter et al 2016), which is also confirmed by this report.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Peatlands are investigated mostly using the ground penetrating radar (GPR) method. Only a few researchers (e.g., Slater and Reeve 2002;Comas et al 2015;Walter et al 2016) have applied induced polarization imaging, electromagnetic terrain conductivity and electrical resistivity imaging, apart from the GPR method, as alternative tools to determine the peatland thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Walter et al . , ) more rapidly and at various spatial scales. When using ERT on peatlands, the electrical conductivity (reciprocal of resistivity) is closely related to the water content (Comas and Slater ; Ponziani et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…; Walter et al . , ) and peat properties (Comas and Slater ; Kettridge et al . ; Ponziani, Slob and Ngan‐Tillard ; Comas et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2004; Kowalczyk and Mieszkowski, 2011;Comas et al, 2015;Walter et al, 2016) and at present more frequently for recognizing the extent of organic soils in the foundations of designed investments (Maślakowski et al, 2014a;Pasierb and Nawrocki, 2015). Electrical resistivity imaging (ERI) is often used in the recognition of complex geological conditions in investigations of the foundations of roads and motorways (Ganerød et al, 2006;Maślakowski et al, 2014a;Ngan-Tillard et al, 2010;Osinowo et al, 2011;Wisén et al, 2008;Kowalczyk et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%