2020
DOI: 10.3190/jgeosci.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stratigraphy, structure and geology of Late Miocene Verkhneavachinskaya caldera with basaltic-andesitic ignimbrites at Eastern Kamchatka

Abstract: We describe a new caldera-volcano in the volcanic front of Kamchatka named Verkhneavachinskaya caldera (VC). According to geological mapping, the VC is interpreted as an eroded shield volcano with a summit caldera exposing 1 km-thick lava-like ignimbrites. It is one of the largest (10 × 12 km diameter) and oldest (c. 5.78-5.58 Ma, Ar-Ar dating) morphologically preserved paleovolcano in Kamchatka. The welded ignimbrites with fiammes are andesites-basaltic andesites in composition, they are more mafic than most … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Detroit record can more readily pretend to be the most complete documented record of explosive volcanism of Kamchatka because this record consists of about 10 times more eruptions with M ∼ 7.5 than it was known before from the onshore record. On the other hand, the Detroit record cannot be considered complete because many voluminous ignimbrites of Kamchatka (e.g., Bergal‐Kuvikas et al., 2019; Bindeman et al., 2010; Portnyagin et al., 2020) left no visible tephra layer in the Detroit section. Reconstruction of a complete history of Kamchatka volcanism will require integration of all available data from on‐land of off‐shore records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Detroit record can more readily pretend to be the most complete documented record of explosive volcanism of Kamchatka because this record consists of about 10 times more eruptions with M ∼ 7.5 than it was known before from the onshore record. On the other hand, the Detroit record cannot be considered complete because many voluminous ignimbrites of Kamchatka (e.g., Bergal‐Kuvikas et al., 2019; Bindeman et al., 2010; Portnyagin et al., 2020) left no visible tephra layer in the Detroit section. Reconstruction of a complete history of Kamchatka volcanism will require integration of all available data from on‐land of off‐shore records.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-Holocene proximal pyroclastic deposits, however, have been affected by glaciations and tectonic activity and consist of complex, partially eroded and often densely vegetated successions, permitting reconstruction of only disparate fragments of the eruptive history. Therefore, terrestrial record of the late Miocene-Pleistocene explosive activity in Kamchatka includes only ∼30 dated ignimbrites (Bergal-Kuvikas et al, 2019;Bindeman et al, 2010Bindeman et al, , 2019Seligman et al, 2014) and a continuous but short (∼30 ka) tephra record from the Central Kamchatka Depression (Ponomareva et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was calculated on the report of 2019; c Geological formations of MPZD are based on Geological map (2000), Krohin (1954), Dirksen (2009). The boundary of Karymshina caldera and distribution of ignimbrites of Verkhnaevachinskaya caldera are illustrated using Bergal-Kuvikas et al, 2019;Leonov and Rogozin, 2007. Locations of cinder cone of Khlebalkina island and extrusive dome in Avacha bay are shown using Dmitriev and Ezhov (1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Характерно чередование базальтов повышенной щелочности с базальтами известково-щелочной серии [31]. Нижняя возрастная граница раннего этапа по палеонтологическим данным определяется поздним миоценом [5] и согласуется с новыми Ar-Ar датировками андезибазальтовых игнимбритов 5.8-5.6 млн лет [56]. Верхняя -четко не определена, но по имеющимся данным этот этап включает весь плиоцен [2], а, возможно, и ранний плейстоцен [33].…”
Section: восточная камчаткаunclassified
“…2 -позднемиоцен-плиоценовые вулканиты: позднемиоценовые базальты щапинской свиты [5]; среднемиоценовые габброиды и позднемиоценовые базальтоиды района г. Корниловской восточных отрогов Baлангинского хребта [6]; позднемиоценовые щелочные габброиды и трахидолериты Кроноцкого перешейка, р. Мал. Чажма и п-ова Камчатский Мыс [38][39][40]; позднемиоцен-плиоценовые адакиты и Nb-обогащенные базальты Восточной Камчатки [3]; андезибазальтовые и андезитовые игнимбриты (5.78-5.58 млн лет) Верхнеавачинской кальдеры [56]. б -Южная Камчатка (309 анализов): 1 -позднеплейстоцен-голоценовые (Q 3-4 ) толеитовые базальты и трахиандезиты вулк.…”
Section: обсуждение результатов исследованийunclassified