1999
DOI: 10.2307/4003683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream Channel and Vegetation Responses to Late Spring Cattle Grazing

Abstract: A 10-year riparian grazing study was conducted on a cold, mountain meadow riparian system in central Idaho in response to cattle grazing-salmonid fisheries conflicts. Six pastures were established along Stanley Creek to study the effects on riparian habitat of no grazing, light grazing (20-25% utilization), and medium grazing (35-50%) during late June. Stream channels narrowed, stream width-depth ratios were reduced, and channel bottom embeddedness decreased under all 3 grazing treatments as the area responded… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Virtually all streamside variables changed from initial conditions toward conditions more beneficial for salmonid fisheries habitat when pastures were not grazed or when pastures were grazed to a 14 cm streamside stubble height. A lesser number of variables improved when pastures were grazed to a 10 cm streamside graminoid stubble height (Clary 1999). Although this study did not include a stubble height treatment (and associated grazing intensity) that would be too severe for any riparian recovery, we consider that it has provided evidence for defining a critical forage stubble height for the mountain meadow situation studied.…”
Section: Overall Riparian System Response To Control Of Stubble Heightmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Virtually all streamside variables changed from initial conditions toward conditions more beneficial for salmonid fisheries habitat when pastures were not grazed or when pastures were grazed to a 14 cm streamside stubble height. A lesser number of variables improved when pastures were grazed to a 10 cm streamside graminoid stubble height (Clary 1999). Although this study did not include a stubble height treatment (and associated grazing intensity) that would be too severe for any riparian recovery, we consider that it has provided evidence for defining a critical forage stubble height for the mountain meadow situation studied.…”
Section: Overall Riparian System Response To Control Of Stubble Heightmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Buckhouse et al (1981) reported no increase in streambank erosion with moderate levels of livestock grazing, and Marlow and Pogacnik (1985) found that limiting livestock grazing to periods when streambanks were relatively dry could greatly reduce physical damage. In Idaho maintaining stubble heights of 10 to 14 cm allowed streambank recovery, although at a slower rate than occurred under no grazing (Clary 1999). Simulated grazing procedures have illustrated that relatively continuous hoof action can severely break down streambanks, while more restricted use can result in minimal changes (Clary and Kinney 2000).…”
Section: Indirect Effects Streambank Tramplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…enhanced width-depth ratios) (Clary 1999;Scrimgeour and Kendall 2003), stream banks (e.g. decreased stability) (Trimble and Mendel 1995;Clary 1999;Scrimgeour and Kendall 2003), and stream water (e.g. nutrient enrichment) (Agouridis et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lowering and contraction of the hyporheic zone) (Dobkin et al 1998), stream channels (e.g. enhanced width-depth ratios) (Clary 1999;Scrimgeour and Kendall 2003), stream banks (e.g. decreased stability) (Trimble and Mendel 1995;Clary 1999;Scrimgeour and Kendall 2003), and stream water (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Therefore, utilization standards limiting grazing disturbances and adaptive grazing strategies controlling timing, intensity, and distribution of livestock grazing are critical in maintaining functional grazed systems and promoting win-win benefits for multiple ecosystem services, as observed in this study (e.g., positive relationships between species diversity, forage resource value, and cattle use) (Clary 1999, George et al 2011, Freitas et al 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%