2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream flow changes across North Carolina (USA) 1955–2012 with implications for environmental flow management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this limitation, we sought to explicitly adjust for other drivers of change to quantify impacts that are related to the dam, rather than other changes such as land use or climate (Fantin-Cruz et al, 2015). This was accomplished by comparing flow variation in rivers impacted by hydropower plants to flow variation in undammed rivers, which were used as controls (see Singer, 2007;Rheinheimer and Viers, 2015;Meitzen, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this limitation, we sought to explicitly adjust for other drivers of change to quantify impacts that are related to the dam, rather than other changes such as land use or climate (Fantin-Cruz et al, 2015). This was accomplished by comparing flow variation in rivers impacted by hydropower plants to flow variation in undammed rivers, which were used as controls (see Singer, 2007;Rheinheimer and Viers, 2015;Meitzen, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 0.5 value was set as the threshold for D m and D max , and 0.75 was set as the threshold for D a , which is mainly based on the threshold of the IHA and RVA. Even though they have been applied in many studies, some thresholds should be further proved, such as the range of hydrological alteration [52]. The watershed diversity of the threshold values should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the spatial information was taken in the summer season, it was necessary to estimate the magnitude of change with statistical tests. We used Student's t-test [52,53] to evaluate the mean change, and Fisher's [54] F-test to evaluate the variance change, for the preand post-dam periods. Although the literature describes a general tendency due to dam operation (increased discharges during the dry period, medium discharges maintained, and decreased high discharges [51,55,56]), the influence of a dam is also observed in annual values.…”
Section: Discharge and Sediment Datamentioning
confidence: 99%