2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.00979.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.)

Abstract: SUMMARY 1. The effects of catchment urbanisation on water quality were examined for 30 streams (stratified into 15, 50 and 100 km2 ± 25% catchments) in the Etowah River basin, Georgia, U.S.A. We examined relationships between land cover (implying cover and use) in these catchments (e.g. urban, forest and agriculture) and macroinvertebrate assemblage attributes using several previously published indices to summarise macroinvertebrate response. Based on a priori predictions as to mechanisms of biotic impairment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
299
2
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
22
299
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have recommended several variables as the most responsive for monitoring urban systems, for example (1) taxon richness, EPT richness, and the ICI in GA [156]; (2) Margelef's richness, predator richness, and omnivore richness in Texan streams [105]; and 3) the stream condition index (SCI) in FL, USA [157]. While urbanization is known to decrease the abundance and diversity of organisms living in streams, it is not clear which forcing factors, such as changes in discharge, sediment, and pollutant concentrations, are most important for causing decreased diversity [101].…”
Section: Urbanization Effects On Biological Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have recommended several variables as the most responsive for monitoring urban systems, for example (1) taxon richness, EPT richness, and the ICI in GA [156]; (2) Margelef's richness, predator richness, and omnivore richness in Texan streams [105]; and 3) the stream condition index (SCI) in FL, USA [157]. While urbanization is known to decrease the abundance and diversity of organisms living in streams, it is not clear which forcing factors, such as changes in discharge, sediment, and pollutant concentrations, are most important for causing decreased diversity [101].…”
Section: Urbanization Effects On Biological Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macroinvertebrate and fish classes showed a closer relationship with BOD (r= 0.50, 0.43, respectively) than with habitat quality (r= 0.41, 0.32, respectively), confirming the findings of previous studies. Nonetheless, numerous studies have reported that watershed land use influences the physical and chemical characteristics of streams, including water and habitat quality (Omernik et al, 1981;Osborne and Wiley, 1988;Richards et al, 1993;Allan, 1995;Richards et al, 1996;Allan et al, 1997), and the ecological communities in streams (Roth et al, 1996;Allan et al, 1997;Kennen, 1999;Wang et al, 2001;Roy et al, 2003;Moerke and Lamberti, 2006). Companion studies under NAEMP at site and regional scales have indicated significant relationships between human land uses, including urban and agricultural land uses, and all biological criteria for streams in Korea; human uses have been found to negatively affect biological criteria, while natural areas have shown positive effects on biological communities in streams (Wallace et al, 1997;Moore and Palmer, 2005).…”
Section: Relationships Among Naemp Criteria and Their Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, environmental condition takes part for the overall condition of the species and may enhance its fitness to resist alterations. According to Allan (2004), Richards et al (1996) and Roy et al (2003), human activities along the Nile can have some impacts on water quality, habitat, and aquatic biota and can play a significant role in defining Nile condition and thus create developmental stressors resulting in FA. In addition, pesticides and fertilizers are main factors to contamination of water and aquatic natural resources (Manjare et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%